Rectal methohexital sedation for computed tomography imaging of stable pediatric emergency department patients

被引:35
作者
Pomeranz, ES
Chudnofsky, CR
Deegan, TJ
Lozon, MM
Mitchiner, JC
Weber, JE
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, St Joseph Mercy Hosp, Emergency Med Residency Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Hurley Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan Hosp, Childrens Emergency Serv, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] St Joseph Mercy Hosp, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
methohexital; pediatric procedure sedation; rectal administration; computerized tomography imaging;
D O I
10.1542/peds.105.5.1110
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. Rapid onset of sleep, brief duration of action, and ease of administration are properties that make rectal methohexital (MXT) an attractive choice for sedating stable pediatric emergency department (ED) patients for computed tomography (CT) imaging. Methodology. One hundred stable patients between 3 and 60 months of age who presented to any of 3 participating EDs and required sedation to undergo CT scanning were given 25 mg/kg of rectal MXT similar to 15 minutes before their imaging. Vital signs and oxygen saturation were recorded at regular intervals. Data collected included indication for CT imaging, time to achieve sleep, time to reach discharge criteria, adequacy of sedation, adverse effects, and parental satisfaction. Results. Ninety-five percent of the patients were adequately sedated with rectal MXT. It took an average of 8 minutes to achieve full sedation and the duration of action averaged 79.3 minutes. Ten percent had transient side effects, but all recovered completely. None required intubation. Parental satisfaction was 90%. Conclusion. Rectal MXT compares favorably to other methods of nonintravenous sedation for CT scanning of stable pediatric ED patients in terms of rapidity of onset and reliability but does cause a significant amount of transient respiratory depression. Its use requires careful monitoring of oxygen saturation and should be used only in a setting where physicians skilled in airway management are present. If these requirements are met, it may be a good choice for the relatively noninvasive sedation of pediatric ED patients undergoing painless but anxiety-provoking procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1114
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] ALLEN EM, 1982, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V56, P240, DOI 10.1097/00000542-198203000-00031
  • [2] A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF RECTAL METHOHEXITAL - EFFICACY AND SIDE-EFFECTS IN 648 CASES
    AUDENAERT, SM
    MONTGOMERY, CL
    THOMPSON, DE
    SUTHERLAND, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (05) : 957 - 961
  • [3] CHLORAL HYDRATE FOR EMERGENT PEDIATRIC PROCEDURAL SEDATION - A NEW LOOK AT AN OLD DRUG
    BINDER, LS
    LEAKE, LA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 9 (06) : 530 - 534
  • [4] BOWERS RM, 1995, ACAD EMERG MED, V5, P428
  • [5] COVENTRY DM, 1991, EUR J ANAESTH, V8, P29
  • [6] GLASIER CM, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P111
  • [7] GRISWOLD JD, 1987, ANESTHESIOLOG, V67, pA3
  • [8] RECTAL METHOHEXITAL FOR SEDATION OF CHILDREN DURING IMAGING PROCEDURES
    MANULI, MA
    DAVIES, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (03) : 577 - 580
  • [9] ORALLO MO, 1965, ANESTH ANALG, V1, P97
  • [10] COMPARISON OF SEDATION REGIMENS FOR PEDIATRIC OUTPATIENT CT
    PEREIRA, JK
    BURROWS, PE
    RICHARDS, HM
    CHUANG, SH
    BABYN, PS
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1993, 23 (05) : 341 - 344