Structural determinants for high-affinity binding of insulin-like growth factor II to insulin receptor (IR)-A, the exon 11 minus isoform of the IR

被引:170
作者
Denley, A
Bonython, ER
Booker, GW
Cosgrove, LJ
Forbes, BE
Ward, CW
Wallace, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Mol & Biomed Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Div Hlth Sci & Nutr, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Div Hlth Sci & Nutr, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1210/me.2004-0183
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The insulin receptor (IR) lacking the alternatively spliced exon 11 (IR-A) is preferentially expressed in fetal and cancer cells. The IR-A has been identified as a high-affinity receptor for insulin and IGF-II but not IGF-I, which it binds with substantially lower affinity. Several cancer cell types that express the IR-A also overexpress IGF-II, suggesting a possible autocrine proliferative loop. To determine the regions of IGF-I and IGF-II responsible for this differential affinity, chimeras were made where the C and D domains were exchanged between IGF-I and IGF-II either singly or together. The abilities of these chimeras to bind to, and activate, the IR-A were investigated. We also investigated the ability of these chimeras to bind and activate the IR exon 11+ isoform (IR-B) and as a positive control, the IGF-I receptor (IGF-1R). We show that the C domain and, to a lesser extent, the D domains represent the principal determinants of the binding differences between IGF-I and IGF-II to IR-A. The C and D domains of IGF-II promote higher affinity binding to the IR-A than the equivalent domains of IGF-I, resulting in an affinity close to that of insulin for the IR-A. The C and D domains also regulate the IR-B binding specificity of the IGFs in a similar manner, although the level of binding for all IGF ligands to IR-B is lower than to IR-A. In contrast, the C and D domains of IGF-I allow higher affinity binding to the IGF-1R than the analogous domains of IGF-II. Activation of IGF-1R by the chimeras reflected their binding affinities whereas the phosphorylation of the two IR isoforms was more complex.
引用
收藏
页码:2502 / 2512
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Structure and function of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor [J].
Adams, TE ;
Epa, VC ;
Garrett, TPJ ;
Ward, CW .
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2000, 57 (07) :1050-1093
[2]  
BAYNE ML, 1989, J BIOL CHEM, V264, P11004
[3]  
BAYNE ML, 1990, J BIOL CHEM, V265, P15648
[4]   Dimeric fragment of the insulin receptor α-subunit finds insulin with full holoreceptor affinity [J].
Brandt, J ;
Andersen, AS ;
Kristensen, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (15) :12378-12384
[5]   Structural origins of the functional divergence of human insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin [J].
Brzozowski, AM ;
Dodson, EJ ;
Dodson, GG ;
Murshudov, GN ;
Verma, C ;
Turkenburg, JP ;
de Bree, FM ;
Dauter, Z .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 41 (30) :9389-9397
[6]   BIAcore analysis of bovine insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 identifies major IGF binding site determinants in both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains [J].
Carrick, FE ;
Forbes, BE ;
Wallace, JC .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (29) :27120-27128
[7]   Human insulin production from a novel mini-proinsulin which has high receptor-binding activity [J].
Chang, SG ;
Kim, DY ;
Choi, KD ;
Shin, JM ;
Shin, HC .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 329 :631-635
[8]   A highly sensitive and specific assay for determination of IGF-I bioactivity in human serum [J].
Chen, JW ;
Ledet, T ;
Orskov, H ;
Jessen, N ;
Lund, S ;
Whittaker, J ;
De Meyts, P ;
Larsen, MB ;
Christiansen, JS ;
Frystyk, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2003, 284 (06) :E1149-E1155
[9]   SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF HUMAN INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I - A NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE AND RESTRAINED MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS STUDY [J].
COOKE, RM ;
HARVEY, TS ;
CAMPBELL, ID .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 30 (22) :5484-5491
[10]   Structural biology of insulin and IGF1 receptors: Implications for drug design [J].
De Meyts, P ;
Whittaker, J .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2002, 1 (10) :769-783