Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL

被引:81
作者
Candau, C
Saussine, C
Lang, H
Roy, C
Faure, F
Jacqmin, D
机构
[1] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Serv Chirurg Urol, Dept Urol, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Dept Radiol, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
关键词
residual stone fragments; extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; kidney; calculi;
D O I
10.1159/000020093
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: After extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), residual fragments (RF) 4 mm or less are usually considered as clinically insignificant. We retrospectively reviewed the natural history and clinical significance of 97 noninfected and isolated RF (4 mm or less) observed 3 months after the last ESWL session on renal tomography. Patients and Methods: They represented 83 among 1,216 patients treated by ESWL over a 9-year period (1989-1997). These RF were mostly localized in the inferior calyx (62%). Median follow-up was 40.6 months (range: 7-96 months). Renal tomography was always performed at the end of follow-up. Results: Stone-free status, or a decreased, stable or increased amount of residual stone occurred in 27 (33%), 1 (1%), 24 (29%) and 31 (37%) of the 83 patients, respectively. During this study, 18 patients (22%) were proposed for a complementary treatment related to a size increase of the residual fragments (13 ESWL, 1 retrograde endoscopy, 3 percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and 1 polar inferior nephrectomy). Conclusion: The term clinically insignificant should not be employed to describe RF after ESWL. Efforts should be performed to obtain true stone-free status after ESWL. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Baser.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 22
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ACKERMANN DK, 1994, EUR UROL, V25, P105
[2]   EFFICACY OF 2ND GENERATION LITHOTRIPTORS - A MULTICENTER COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 2,206 EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY TREATMENTS WITH THE SIEMENS-LITHOSTAR, DORNIER-HM4, WOLF-PIEZOLITH-2300, DIREX-TRIPTER-X-1 AND BREAKSTONE-LITHOTRIPTORS [J].
BIERKENS, AF ;
HENDRIKX, AJM ;
DEKORT, VJW ;
DEREYKE, T ;
BRUYNEN, CAH ;
BOUVE, ER ;
BEEK, TVD ;
VOS, P ;
BERKEL, HV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03) :1052-1057
[3]  
BROWNLEE N, 1990, Journal of Urology, V143, P1096
[4]   Minor residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: Spontaneous clearance or risk factor for recurrent stone formation? [J].
Buchholz, NP ;
MeierPadel, S ;
Rutishauser, G .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) :227-232
[5]   COMPARISON OF FIRST GENERATION (DORNIER-HM3) AND 2ND GENERATION (MEDSTONE-STS) LITHOTRIPTORS - TREATMENT RESULTS WITH 13,864 RENAL AND URETERAL CALCULI [J].
CASS, AS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :588-592
[6]  
CICERELLO E, 1984, J UROLOGY, V151, P5
[7]   REPORT OF THE UNITED-STATES COOPERATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
DRACH, GW ;
DRETLER, S ;
FAIR, W ;
FINLAYSON, B ;
GILLENWATER, J ;
GRIFFITH, D ;
LINGEMAN, J ;
NEWMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (06) :1127-1133
[8]   THE FATE OF RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS AFTER EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
EISENBERGER, F ;
BUB, P ;
SCHMIDT, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1992, 6 (03) :217-219
[9]   EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF URINARY CALCULI - EXPERIENCE IN TREATMENT OF 3,278 PATIENTS USING THE SIEMENS LITHOSTAR AND LITHOSTAR PLUS [J].
ELDAMANHOURY, H ;
SCHARFE, T ;
RUTH, J ;
ROOS, S ;
HOHENFELLNER, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (03) :484-488
[10]   Effectiveness and safety of the Dornier compact lithotriptor: An evaluative multicenter study [J].
Elhilali, MM ;
Stoller, ML ;
McNamara, TC ;
Morehouse, DD ;
Wolf, JS ;
Keeler, LL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (03) :834-838