Waiting list management: priority criteria or first-in first-out? A case for total joint replacement

被引:14
作者
Escobar, Antonio [1 ]
Quintana, Jose Ma [2 ]
Gonzalez, Marta [1 ]
Bilbao, Amaia [3 ]
Ibanez, Berta [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Basurto, Res Unit, Bilbao 48013, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Res Unit, Bizkaia, Spain
[3] Fdn Vasca Innovac & Invest Sanitaria BIOEF, Sondika, Bizkaia, Spain
关键词
priority tool; total joint replacement; waiting time; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP; HEALTH-STATUS; NEW-ZEALAND; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; WOMAC; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01056.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Background Total joint replacements are interventions with large waiting times from indication to the surgery management. These patients can be managed in two ways; first-in first-out or through a priority tool. The aim of this study was to compare real time on waiting list (TWL) with a priority criteria score, developed by our team, in patients awaiting joint replacement due to osteoarthritis. Methods Consecutive patients placed on waiting list were eligible. Patients fulfilled a questionnaire which included items of our priority tool and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) specific questionnaire. Other priority items were extracted from the clinical history. The priority tool gives a score from 0 to 100 points, and three categories (urgent, preferent and ordinary). We studied the differences among categories and TWL by means of one-way analysis of variance. Correlational analysis was used to evaluate association among priority score and TWL and WOMAC baseline and gains at 6 months with priority score and TWL. Results We have studied 684 patients. Women represented 62% of sample. The mean age was 70 years. There were not association between the categories of priority score and TWL (P = 0.12). The rho correlation coefficient between TWL and priority score was -0.11. Among baseline WOMAC scores and priority score, the rho coefficients were 0.79, 0.7 and 0.52 with function, pain and stiffness dimensions, respectively. There were differences in the mean scores of WOMAC dimensions according to the three priority categories (P < 0.001) but no with TWL categories. Data of gains in both health-related quality of life dimensions at 6 months were similar, with differences according to priority categories but no regarding TWL. Conclusions The results of the study support the necessity of implementing a prioritization system instead of the actual system if we want to manage the waiting list for joint replacement with clinical equity.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 601
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Arnett G, 2003, CAN J SURG, V46, P290
[2]
Batlle-Gualda Enrique, 1999, Revista Espanola de Reumatologia, V26, P38
[3]
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[4]
EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION OF TOXIC PEPTIDES FROM NATURAL BLOOMS AND LABORATORY ISOLATES OF THE CYANOBACTERIUM MICROCYSTIS-AERUGINOSA [J].
BROOKS, WP ;
CODD, GA .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 2 (01) :1-3
[5]
PATIENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRICOMPARTMENTAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CALLAHAN, CM ;
DRAKE, BG ;
HECK, DA ;
DITTUS, RS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (17) :1349-1357
[6]
Coleman Brendan, 2005, N Z Med J, V118, pU1463
[7]
Conner-Spady Barbara, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P84, DOI 10.1258/1355819053559155
[8]
Conner-Spady BL, 2004, CAN J SURG, V47, P39
[9]
Prioritizing patients for elective surgery - A prospective study of clinical priority assessment criteria in New Zealand [J].
Derrett, S ;
Devlin, N ;
Hansen, P ;
Herbison, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 19 (01) :91-105
[10]
Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement [J].
Escobar, A. ;
Quintana, J. M. ;
Bilbao, A. ;
Arosteigui, I. ;
Lafuente, I. ;
Vidaurreta, I. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2007, 15 (03) :273-280