Hypoperfusion in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease by arterial spin labeling MRI

被引:232
作者
Du, A. T.
Jahng, G. H.
Hayasaka, S.
Kramer, J. H.
Rosen, H. J.
Gorno-Tempini, M. L.
Rankin, K. P.
Miller, B. L.
Weiner, M. W.
Schuff, N.
机构
[1] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Neurodegenerat Dis, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; GLUCOSE-METABOLISM; SEMANTIC DEMENTIA; CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS; LOBAR DEGENERATION; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; BRAIN ATROPHY; SPM ANALYSIS; SPECT; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000238163.71349.78
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To test if arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI could detect a pattern of hypoperfusion in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) vs cognitively normal (CN) control subjects; to determine the regional difference of perfusion between FTD and Alzheimer disease (AD); and to determine whether hypoperfusion in FTD correlates with cognitive impairment. Methods: We included 21 patients with FTD, 24 patients with AD, and 25 CN subjects in this cross-sectional MRI study. All subjects had MRI scans including T1-weighted structural images and ASL-MR images. Results: ASL-MRI detected a pattern of hypoperfusion in right frontal regions in patients with FTD vs CN subjects, similar to PET and SPECT. FTD had higher perfusion than AD in the parietal regions and posterior cingulate. Frontal hypoperfusion in FTD correlated with deficits in judgment and problem solving. Adding frontal perfusion to gray matter (GM) atrophy significantly improved the classification of FTD from normal aging to 74%, and adding parietal perfusion to GM atrophy significantly improved the classification of FTD from AD to 75%. Combining frontal and parietal lobe perfusion further improved the classification of FTD from AD to 87%. Conclusion: Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease display different spatial distributions of hypoperfusion on arterial spin labeling MRI. With further development and evaluation, arterial spin labeling MRI could contribute to the differential diagnosis between frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1220
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Alsop DC, 2000, ANN NEUROL, V47, P93, DOI 10.1002/1531-8249(200001)47:1<93::AID-ANA15>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-8
[3]   Voxel-based morphometry - The methods [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (06) :805-821
[4]  
Bartenstein P, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1095
[5]   Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia are differentiated by discriminant analysis applied to 99mTc HmPAO SPECT data [J].
Charpentier, P ;
Lavenu, I ;
Defebvre, L ;
Duhamel, A ;
Lecouffe, P ;
Pasquier, F ;
Steinling, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 69 (05) :661-663
[6]   Cerebral metabolic patterns at early stages of frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.: A PET study [J].
Diehl, J ;
Grimmer, T ;
Drzezga, A ;
Riemenschneider, M ;
Förstl, H ;
Kurz, A .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 (08) :1051-1056
[7]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[8]   ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE - FOCAL CORTICAL CHANGES SHOWN BY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
FOSTER, NL ;
CHASE, TN ;
FEDIO, P ;
PATRONAS, NJ ;
BROOKS, RA ;
DICHIRO, G .
NEUROLOGY, 1983, 33 (08) :961-965
[9]   Hippocampal and entorhinal cortex atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease [J].
Frisoni, GB ;
Laakso, MP ;
Beltramello, A ;
Geroldi, C ;
Bianchetti, A ;
Soininen, H ;
Trabucchi, M .
NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (01) :91-100
[10]   Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia exhibit distinct atrophy-behavior correlates: A computer-assisted imaging study [J].
Gee, J ;
Ding, LJ ;
Xie, ZY ;
Lin, M ;
DeVita, C ;
Grossman, M .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (12) :1392-1401