Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas: II - Clinical results

被引:129
作者
Lauve, A
Morris, M
Schmidt-Ullrich, R
Wu, QW
Mohan, R
Abayomi, O
Buck, D
Holdford, D
Dawson, K
Dinardo, L
Reiter, E
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
intensity-modulated radiotherapy; dose escalation; head-and-neck cancer; simultaneous integrated boost;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a Phase I radiation dose-escalation trial to determine the maximal tolerable dose (MTD) deliverable to the gross tumor volume (GTV) using an accelerated fractionation with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy regimen with parotid gland sparing as the sole therapy in the treatment of locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. The primary objective was the definition of the MTD using established criteria of quantifying acute dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives included analysis of failure patterns, tumor control rates, and toxicity. Methods and Materials: Between July 1999 and June 2002, eligible patients with bulky Stage 11 to Stage IVB head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma, excluding laryngeal primaries, were enrolled. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with 6-MV photons using a "sliding-window" technique. Enrollment of 6 patients for each dose level was planned; if DLTs were seen in >2 of 6 patients, the previous dose was to be expanded by an additional 6 patients to confirm that dose level as the MTD. All schedules administered a total of 30 fractions, but with escalating doses per fraction (2.27, 2.36, and 2.46 Gy) to achieve a total dose to the GTV of 68.1, 70.8, and 73.8 Gy, respectively. The remaining target tissues were constrained to receive the same dose in all patients regardless of the GTV dose level. The clinical target volume, defined as tissue within 1 cm around the GTV (at high risk of subclinical disease), received 60 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.0 Gy. The electively irradiated target volume, defined as the clinically uninvolved lymph node-bearing tissues, received 54 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy. The parotid glands were spared to the degree possible without compromising target coverage. Acute toxicity was scored weekly using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. DLT was defined as any Grade 4 acute toxicity or any acute toxicity requiring either a dose reduction or a treatment break of >5 treatment days. Results: Of 18 men and 2 women (average age, 57 years; range, 37-80 years), 17 presented with oropharyngeal primary tumors, and 1 each with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, nasopharynx, and hypopharynx. None of the 6 patients at dose level 1, and 2 of the 6 patients initially enrolled at dose level 2, developed DLT. Both patients treated at dose level 3 required a 3-day treatment break and dose reduction after rapid development of Grade 3 toxicity (by Day 15). Six additional confirmatory patients subsequently enrolled at dose level 2 completed treatment without DLT. At least 50% of the total parotid gland volume received <30 Gy in 14 patients (average, 54% of volume), with an average mean dose of 32 Gy. In contrast, greater than or equal to50% of the distal parotid gland volume received <25 Gy in 15 patients (average, 63% of volume), with an average mean dose of 24 Gy. With a median follow-up of 20 months from the date of enrollment and 28 months for surviving patients, the actuarial 2-year local control (primary site), regional control (nodal sites), and distant control rate was 76.3%, 66.7%, and 71.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Dose level 2,70.8 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.36 Gy, was defined as the MTD deliverable to the GTV using this accelerated fractionation with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy regimen with parotid gland sparing as the sole treatment for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Adequate parotid sparing was achievable in most cases. Early toxicity, tumor control, and survival rates compared favorably with the outcomes after other accelerated regimens. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 387
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Amosson C. M., 2002, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V54, P18, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03088-2
[2]   CONCOMITANT BOOST RADIOTHERAPY SCHEDULES IN THE TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE OROPHARYNX AND NASOPHARYNX [J].
ANG, KK ;
PETERS, LJ ;
WEBER, RS ;
MAOR, MH ;
MORRISON, WH ;
WENDT, CD ;
BROWN, BW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (06) :1339-1345
[3]   Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: A new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy [J].
Butler, EB ;
Teh, BS ;
Grant, WH ;
Uhl, BM ;
Kuppersmith, RB ;
Chiu, JK ;
Donovan, DT ;
Woo, SY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (01) :21-32
[4]   Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Ozyigit, G ;
Tran, BN ;
Cengiz, M ;
Dempsey, JF ;
Low, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (02) :312-321
[5]  
Chao KSC, 2000, INT J CANCER, V90, P92, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000420)90:2<92::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-9
[7]   A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: Initial results [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Deasy, JO ;
Markman, J ;
Haynie, J ;
Perez, CA ;
Purdy, JA ;
Low, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04) :907-916
[8]   LATE EFFECTS OF RADIATION-THERAPY IN THE HEAD AND NECK REGION [J].
COOPER, JS ;
FU, K ;
MARKS, J ;
SILVERMAN, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1141-1164
[9]   Patterns of local-regional recurrence following parotid-sparing conformal and segmental intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Dawson, LA ;
Anzai, Y ;
Marsh, L ;
Martel, MK ;
Paulino, A ;
Ship, JA ;
Eisbruch, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1117-1126
[10]   Consequential late effects in normal tissues [J].
Dörr, W ;
Hendry, JH .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (03) :223-231