Machine learning in prognosis of the femoral neck fracture recovery

被引:22
作者
Kukar, M
Kononenko, I
Silvester, T
机构
[1] UNIV LJUBLJANA, FAC COMP & INFORMAT SCI, LJUBLJANA 61001, SLOVENIA
[2] UNIV LJUBLJANA, FAC MED, LJUBLJANA 61001, SLOVENIA
关键词
learning from examples; estimating attributes; explanation ability; impurity function; empirical comparison; multiple knowledge;
D O I
10.1016/S0933-3657(96)00351-X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We compare the performance of several machine learning algorithms in the problem of prognostics of the femoral neck fracture recovery: the K-nearest neighbours algorithm, the semi-naive Bayesian classifier, backpropagation with weight elimination learning of the multilayered neural networks, the LFC (lookahead feature construction) algorithm, and the Assistant-I and Assistant-R algorithms for top down induction of decision trees using information gain and RELIEFF as search heuristics, respectively. We compare the prognostic accuracy and the explanation ability of different classifiers. Among the different algorithms the semi-naive Bayesian classifier and Assistant-R seem to be the most appropriate. We analyze the combination of decisions of several classifiers for solving prediction problems and show that the combined classifier improves both performance and the explanation ability.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 451
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MACHINE LEARNING
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT SCH SYNTH EXP KN
[3]  
CESTNIK B, 1991, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V482, P138, DOI 10.1007/BFb0017010
[4]  
Cestnik B., 1990, P EUR C ART INT, P147
[5]  
Cestnik B, 1987, P 2 EUR C EUR WORK S, DOI 10.5555/3108739.3108742
[6]  
Craven M. W., 1993, P 10 INT C MACH LEAR, P73
[7]  
Cussents J, 1993, P EUR C MACH LEARN E, P136
[8]  
DIETTERICH TG, 1990, READINGS MACHINE LEA
[9]  
HOJKER S, 1988, P EUR C NUCL MED MIL
[10]  
HORN KA, 1985, AUST COMPUT J, V17, P7