Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients

被引:73
作者
Goeman, L. [1 ]
Salomon, L. [1 ]
La De Taille, A. [1 ]
Vordos, D. [1 ]
Hoznek, A. [1 ]
Yiou, R. [1 ]
Abbou, C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
prostate cancer; laparoscopy; radical prostatectomy; retroperitoneal; long-term results;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-006-0054-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to evaluate the long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). From 2001 to 2005, 550 consecutive patients underwent a laparoscopic extraperitoneal prostatectomy in our department. Continence and erectile function were analysed prospectively by a self-administrated questionnaire. Mean operating time was 188 min, mean bladder catheterisation time 5.9 days, mean hospital stay 4.6 days Pathological stage was pT2 in 55.8%, pT3a in 29.6%, pT3b in 9.1% and pT4a in 5.4% tumours. Positive surgical margins were 17.9% for pT2, 44.8% for pT3 tumours and 71.4% for pT4a tumours. Five years survival without biochemical progression was 78.8%. After 24 months of follow-up, diurnal continence rate was 91%, and potency rate was 64% when both neurovascular bundles were preserved, 78.6% when the patients were younger than 60 years. LRP is now a standardised procedure. An extraperitoneal approach combines the advantages of a laparoscopic procedure with those of an extraperitoneal approach.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 288
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Prevalence and impact of incontinence and impotence following total prostatectomy assessed anonymously by the ICS-male questionnaire [J].
Bates, TS ;
Wright, MPJ ;
Gillatt, DA .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 33 (02) :165-169
[2]   Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Bhayani, SB ;
Pavlovich, CP ;
Hsu, TS ;
Sullivan, W ;
Su, LM .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (03) :612-616
[3]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases [J].
Bollens, R ;
Vanden Bossche, M ;
Roumeguere, T ;
Damoun, A ;
Ekane, S ;
Hoffmann, P ;
Zlotta, AR ;
Schulman, CC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) :65-69
[4]   Prevention and management of incontinence following radical prostatectomy [J].
Carlson, KV ;
Nitti, VW .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :595-+
[5]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[6]   Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A false debate over a real challenge [J].
Cathelineau, X ;
Cahill, D ;
Widmer, H ;
Rozet, F ;
Baumert, H ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) :714-716
[7]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial 70 cases at a US university medical center [J].
Dahl, DM ;
L'esperance, JO ;
Trainer, AF ;
Jiang, Z ;
Gallagher, K ;
Litwin, DEM ;
Blute, RD .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) :859-863
[8]   Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Dillioglugil, O ;
Leibman, BD ;
Leibman, NS ;
Kattan, MW ;
Rosas, AL ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) :1760-1767
[9]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[10]   Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Does the approach matter? [J].
Eden, CG ;
King, D ;
Kooiman, GG ;
Adams, TH ;
Sullivan, ME ;
Vass, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) :2218-2223