Analytic bounds on causal risk differences in directed acyclic graphs involving three observed binary variables

被引:29
作者
Kaufman, Sol [2 ]
Kaufman, Jay S. [1 ]
MacLehose, Richard F. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A2, Canada
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Otolaryngol, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
关键词
Causality; Effect decomposition; Confounding; Sensitivity analysis; Bounding; Linear programming; Counterfactual models; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; IDENTIFICATION; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspi.2009.03.024
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We apply a linear programming approach which uses the causal risk difference (RDc) as the objective function and provides minimum and maximum values that RDc can achieve under any set of linear constraints oil the potential response type distribution. We consider two scenarios involving binary exposure X, covariate Z and outcome Y. In the first, Z is not affected by X, and is a potential confounder of the causal effect of X on Y. In the second, Z is affected by X and intermediate in the causal pathway between X and Y. For each scenario we consider various linear constraints corresponding to the presence or absence of arcs in the associated directed acyclic graph (DAG), monotonicity assumptions. and presence or absence of additive-scale interactions. We also estimate Z-stratum-specific bounds when Z is a potential effect measure modifier and bounds for both controlled and natural direct effects when Z is affected by X. In the absence of any additional constraints deriving from background knowledge, the well-known bounds on RDC are duplicated: -Pr(Y not equal X) <= RDC <= Pr(Y = X). These bounds have unit width, but call be narrowed by background knowledge-based assumptions. We provide and compare bounds and bound widths for various combinations of assumptions ill the two scenarios and apply these bounds to real data from two studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3473 / 3487
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[2]   Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance [J].
Balke, A ;
Pearl, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (439) :1171-1176
[3]  
BALKE AA, 1995, R242 U CAL DEP COMP
[4]   Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable [J].
Brookhart, MA ;
Wang, PS ;
Solomon, DH ;
Schneeweiss, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) :268-275
[5]   Fallibility in estimating direct effects [J].
Cole, SR ;
Hernán, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :163-165
[6]   RANDOMIZATION MODELS FOR MATCHED AND UNMATCHED 2 BY 2 TABLES [J].
COPAS, JB .
BIOMETRIKA, 1973, 60 (03) :467-476
[7]   Relationships between poverty and psychopathology - A natural experiment [J].
Costello, EJ ;
Compton, SN ;
Keeler, G ;
Angold, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (15) :2023-2029
[8]  
Flanders W D, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P239, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199005000-00010
[9]  
GREENLAND S, 1986, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V15, P433
[10]   Instruments for causal inference -: An epidemiologist's dream? [J].
Hernán, MA ;
Robíns, JM .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (04) :360-372