Comparison of different methods for the isolation and purification of total community DNA from soil

被引:231
作者
Krsek, M [1 ]
Wellington, EMH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Biol Sci, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
DNA extraction; microbial community analysis; soil microbiology; total community DNA;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00093-7
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The efficiency and reproducibility of DNA extraction from soil was tested for variations in lyric and purification treatments and their effect on yield and purity of DNA. The extraction yield was improved by increasing the concentration of EDTA or monovalent ions in isolation buffers,, by the introduction of mechanical lysis treatments, and by the use of ethanol precipitation in place of PEG precipitation. Purity was improved using buffers with decreasing concentration of EDTA or by reducing the ionic strength of the buffer, and by all mechanical treatments. No lyric treatment was efficient on its own, the highest purity was achieved using Crombach buffer and a combination of bead-beating with lysozyme and SDS lysis followed by potassium acetate and PEG precipitation, phenol/chloroform purification, isopropanol precipitation, and spermine-HCl precipitation. Sonication sheared the DNA more than bead-heating. Lysozyme and SDS lysis without any mechanical treatments allowed isolation of larger fragments (40-90 kb). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of DNA isolated using a range of lyric treatments revealed alterations in band patterns which might reflect differences in the efficiency of lytic treatments. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   NATURAL TRANSFORMATION OF ACINETOBACTER-CALCOACETICUS BY PLASMID DNA ADSORBED ON SAND AND GROUNDWATER AQUIFER MATERIAL [J].
CHAMIER, B ;
LORENZ, MG ;
WACKERNAGEL, W .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 59 (05) :1662-1667
[2]   DNA BASE COMPOSITION OF SOIL ARTHROBACTERS AND OTHER CORYNEFORMS FROM CHEESE AND SEA FISH [J].
CROMBACH, WH .
ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND SEROLOGY, 1972, 38 (02) :105-&
[3]   Simple and rapid method for direct extraction of microbial DNA from soil for PCR [J].
Cullen, DW ;
Hirsch, PR .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 30 (8-9) :983-993
[4]  
Heuer H., 1997, Modern soil microbiology., P353
[5]   Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients [J].
Heuer, H ;
Krsek, M ;
Baker, P ;
Smalla, K ;
Wellington, EMH .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 63 (08) :3233-3241
[6]  
Holben W. E., 1994, METHODS SOIL ANAL 2, V5, P727
[7]   DNA PROBE METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF SPECIFIC MICROORGANISMS IN THE SOIL BACTERIAL COMMUNITY [J].
HOLBEN, WE ;
JANSSON, JK ;
CHELM, BK ;
TIEDJE, JM .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 54 (03) :703-711
[8]   STUDIES ON THE SELECTIVITY OF DNA PRECIPITATION BY SPERMINE [J].
HOOPES, BC ;
MCCLURE, WR .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1981, 9 (20) :5493-5504
[9]   A DISPERSION AND DIFFERENTIAL CENTRIFUGATION TECHNIQUE FOR REPRESENTATIVELY SAMPLING MICROORGANISMS FROM SOIL [J].
HOPKINS, DW ;
MACNAUGHTON, SJ ;
ODONNELL, AG .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 23 (03) :217-225
[10]  
Hopwood D.A., 1985, GENETIC MANIPULATION