Executive pay and UK privatization: The demise of 'one country, two systems'

被引:13
作者
Cragg, MI
Dyck, IJ
机构
[1] Anal Grp Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00047-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 [经济学];
摘要
Controversy abounds in the UK about increased executive compensation in privatized firms. This study examines the executive pay systems in state-owned and privatized firms against the backdrop of compensation systems in publicly traded firms. We hypothesize the existence of two separate markets for top management in state-owned and! comparable publicly traded firms from 1970 to 1981 and the subsequent merging of these markets after privatization from 1982 to 1994. Consistent with our hypotheses, we document that prior to privatization, top management in state-owned enterprises received half the compensation of their publicly traded counterparts, and the determinants of the level of pay were move bureaucratic: there was no pay for performance, little variation across executives and firms, and systematic age-related pay increases. After privatization, we find a convergence in the level of executive compensation, the intensity of pay for performance, and the variation and determinants of pay across executives and firms. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 18
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
ABOWD J, 1995, DIFFERENCES CHANGE W
[2]
Alchian A., 1977, Economic Forces at Work
[3]
[Anonymous], 1994, WELFARE CONSEQUENCES
[4]
[Anonymous], DOES PRIVATIZATION W
[5]
[Anonymous], OWNERSHIP CONTROL FI
[6]
ARMSTRONG B, 1994, REGULATORY REFORM EC
[7]
TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS - EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM [J].
CONYON, M ;
GREGG, P ;
MACHIN, S .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1995, 105 (430) :704-714
[8]
CRAGG M, 1996, 97045 HARV BUS SCH
[9]
CRAGG M, 1997, 97074 HARV BUS SCH
[10]
*HM TREAS, 1995, HER MAJ TREAS GUID U