Novel structure and nucleotide binding properties of HI1480 from Haemophilus influenzae:: A protein with no known sequence homologues

被引:4
作者
Lim, K
Sarikaya, E
Galkin, A
Krajewski, W
Pullalarevu, S
Shin, JH
Kelman, Z
Howard, A
Herzberg, O
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Maryland Biotechnol Inst, Ctr Adv Res Biotechnol, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Adv Photon Source, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[3] IIT, Biol Chem & Phys Sci Dept, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/prot.20148
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The crystal structure of the Haemophilus influenzae protein HI1480 was determined at 2.1-Angstrom resolution. The amino acid sequence of HI1480 is unique, having no homology with other known protein sequences. The protein adopts a novel alpha+beta fold, and associates into a dimer of tightly associated dimers. The tight dimers are formed by intermolecular interactions that are mediated by an antiparallel beta-barrel involving both monomers. Helical regions of two dimers mediate the tetramer formation. The helical region contains a four-helix bundle that has been seen only in the anticodon binding domains of class I tRNA synthetases. A cluster of four residues, Tyr18, Arg134, Glu26, and Lys12 is located in a depression formed at the four-helix bundle/beta-barrel interface. The arrangement is suggestive of an active center, possibly a catalytic site. The HI1480 gene is located within the Mu-like prophage region of H. influenzae, has no homology to bacteriophage genes, and is flanked by transposases. Hence, this is an example of horizontal transfer from an unknown organism. Gel mobility shift assays revealed that HI1480 binds DNA and RNA molecules. Double-stranded DNA is favored over single-stranded DNA, and longer DNA molecules are bound better than shorter ones. (C) 2004Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 571
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]   Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation [J].
Andrade, MA ;
Brown, NP ;
Leroy, C ;
Hoersch, S ;
de Daruvar, A ;
Reich, C ;
Franchini, A ;
Tamames, J ;
Valencia, A ;
Ouzounis, C ;
Sander, C .
BIOINFORMATICS, 1999, 15 (05) :391-412
[3]   THE CCP4 SUITE - PROGRAMS FOR PROTEIN CRYSTALLOGRAPHY [J].
BAILEY, S .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-BIOLOGICAL CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 1994, 50 :760-763
[4]   On the particularity of pathogens [J].
Bloom, BR .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6797) :760-761
[5]  
Brunger AT, 1998, ACTA CRYSTALLOGR D, V54, P905, DOI 10.1107/s0907444998003254
[6]  
Cowtan K., 1994, JOINT CCP4 ESF EACBM, V31, P34
[7]   The genome sequence of the entomopathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens [J].
Duchaud, E ;
Rusniok, C ;
Frangeul, L ;
Buchrieser, C ;
Givaudan, A ;
Taourit, S ;
Bocs, S ;
Boursaux-Eude, C ;
Chandler, M ;
Charles, JF ;
Dassa, E ;
Derose, R ;
Derzelle, S ;
Freyssinet, G ;
Gaudriault, S ;
Médigue, C ;
Lanois, A ;
Powell, K ;
Siguier, P ;
Vincent, R ;
Wingate, V ;
Zouine, M ;
Glaser, P ;
Boemare, N ;
Danchin, A ;
Kunst, F .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (11) :1307-1313
[8]   WHOLE-GENOME RANDOM SEQUENCING AND ASSEMBLY OF HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE RD [J].
FLEISCHMANN, RD ;
ADAMS, MD ;
WHITE, O ;
CLAYTON, RA ;
KIRKNESS, EF ;
KERLAVAGE, AR ;
BULT, CJ ;
TOMB, JF ;
DOUGHERTY, BA ;
MERRICK, JM ;
MCKENNEY, K ;
SUTTON, G ;
FITZHUGH, W ;
FIELDS, C ;
GOCAYNE, JD ;
SCOTT, J ;
SHIRLEY, R ;
LIU, LI ;
GLODEK, A ;
KELLEY, JM ;
WEIDMAN, JF ;
PHILLIPS, CA ;
SPRIGGS, T ;
HEDBLOM, E ;
COTTON, MD ;
UTTERBACK, TR ;
HANNA, MC ;
NGUYEN, DT ;
SAUDEK, DM ;
BRANDON, RC ;
FINE, LD ;
FRITCHMAN, JL ;
FUHRMANN, JL ;
GEOGHAGEN, NSM ;
GNEHM, CL ;
MCDONALD, LA ;
SMALL, KV ;
FRASER, CM ;
SMITH, HO ;
VENTER, JC .
SCIENCE, 1995, 269 (5223) :496-512
[9]   Microbial genome sequencing [J].
Fraser, CM ;
Eisen, JA ;
Salzberg, SL .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6797) :799-803
[10]   Surprising similarities in structure comparison [J].
Gibrat, JF ;
Madej, T ;
Bryant, SH .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (03) :377-385