Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on Intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer

被引:260
作者
Medeiros, Felipe A.
Weinreb, Robert N.
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Hamilton Glaucoma Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Ophthalmol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
intraocular pressure; tonometry; corneal thickness; corneal elasticity;
D O I
10.1097/01.ijg.0000212268.42606.97
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Purpose: The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) proposes to measure corneal biomechanical properties in vivo by monitoring and analyzing the corneal behavior when this structure is submitted to a force induced by an air jet. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPCC) measurements as obtained by the ORA and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurements. Design: Observational clinical study. Methods: The study included 153 eyes of 78 subjects. All subjects underwent IOP evaluation with the ORA and GAT, and also measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, and axial length. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis were used to evaluate the associations between IOP (as measured with GAT and ORA) and CCT, corneal curvature, axial length, and age. Bland and Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between IOP measurements obtained by GAT and ORA. Results: GAT IOP measurements were significantly associated with CCT (P=0.001) and corneal curvature (P < 0.001), whereas ORA IOPCC measurements were not associated with any of the ocular variables. The difference between GAT and IOPCC measurements was significantly influenced by corneal thickness. Patients with thicker corneas tended to have higher GAT IOP measurements compared with IOPCC, whereas in patients with thin corneas, GAT IOP measurements tended to be lower than IOPCC. Conclusions: ORA IOPCC measurements seem to provide an estimate of IOP that is less influenced by corneal properties than those provided by GAT.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 370
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[2]
Copt RP, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P14
[3]
Damji KF, 2000, J GLAUCOMA, V9, P205
[4]
Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: A review and meta-analysis approach [J].
Doughty, MJ ;
Zaman, ML .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 (05) :367-408
[5]
EHLERS N, 1975, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V53, P34
[6]
ACCOUNTING FOR THE CORRELATION BETWEEN FELLOW EYES IN REGRESSION-ANALYSIS [J].
GLYNN, RJ ;
ROSNER, B .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 110 (03) :381-387
[7]
Gordon MO, 2002, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V120, P714
[8]
Harrel FE, 2001, REGRESSION MODELING, P56
[9]
LIANG KY, 1986, BIOMETRIKA, V73, P13, DOI 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
[10]
Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement - Quantitative analysis [J].
Liu, J ;
Roberts, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (01) :146-155