Drug Insight: vascular disrupting agents and angiogenesis - novel approaches for drug delivery

被引:100
作者
Cooney, Matthew M.
van Heeckeren, Willem
Bhakta, Shyam
Ortiz, Jose
Remick, Scot C.
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Div Hematol & Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Case Comprehens Canc Ctr, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY | 2006年 / 3卷 / 12期
关键词
combretastatin; DMXAA; Exherin (R); TZT-1027; ZD6126;
D O I
10.1038/ncponc0663
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), or endothelial disrupting agents, attempt to exploit the vascular endothelium that supplies rapidly dividing neoplasms. Unlike antiangiogenesis agents ( e. g. the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab; and tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib) that disrupt endothelial cell survival mechanisms and the development of a new tumor blood supply, VDAs are designed to disrupt the already established abnormal vasculature that supports tumors, by targeting their dysmorphic endothelial cells. Tumor vascular endothelium is characterized by its increased permeability, abnormal morphology, disorganized vascular networks, and variable density. VDAs induce rapid shutdown of tumor blood supply, causing subsequent tumor death from hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. The safety profile of this class of compounds is more indicative of agents that are indeed 'vascularly' active. For example, VDAs can cause: acute coronary and other thrombophlebitic syndromes; alterations in blood pressure, heart rate, and ventricular conduction; transient flush and hot flashes; neuropathy; and tumor pain. Despite these cardiovascular concerns some patients have benefited from VDAs in early clinical trials. Further drug development of VDAs must include the combination of these agents with other novel biological agents, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Close monitoring of patients receiving VDAs for any cardiovascular toxicity is imperative.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 692
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Assessment of pharmacodynamic vascular response in a phase I trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate
    Anderson, HL
    Yap, JT
    Miller, MP
    Robbins, A
    Jones, T
    Price, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (15) : 2823 - 2830
  • [2] Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model
    Arap, W
    Pasqualini, R
    Ruoslahti, E
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5349) : 377 - 380
  • [3] INHIBITION OF GROWTH OF COLON-38 ADENOCARCINOMA BY VINBLASTINE AND COLCHICINE - EVIDENCE FOR A VASCULAR MECHANISM
    BAGULEY, BC
    HOLDAWAY, KM
    THOMSEN, LL
    ZHUANG, L
    ZWI, LJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 27 (04) : 482 - 487
  • [4] Selective ablation of immature blood vessels in established human tumors follows vascular endothelial growth factor withdrawal
    Benjamin, LE
    Golijanin, D
    Itin, A
    Pode, D
    Keshet, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1999, 103 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [5] REDUCTION OF TUMOR BLOOD-FLOW BY FLAVONE ACETIC-ACID - A POSSIBLE COMPONENT OF THERAPY
    BIBBY, MC
    DOUBLE, JA
    LOADMAN, PM
    DUKE, CV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (03) : 216 - 222
  • [6] Phase I trial of combretastatin A-4 phosphate with carboplatin
    Bilenker, JH
    Flaherty, KT
    Rosen, M
    Davis, L
    Gallagher, M
    Stevenson, JP
    Sun, WJ
    Vaughn, D
    Giantonio, B
    Zimmer, R
    Schnall, M
    O'Dwyer, PJ
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (04) : 1527 - 1533
  • [7] BLAGEN S, 2005, P AM SOC CLIN ONCO S, V23, pS226
  • [8] Blakey DC, 2002, CLIN CANCER RES, V8, P1974
  • [9] Browder T, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P1878
  • [10] TUMOR-NECROSIS-FACTOR-ALPHA PLASMA-LEVELS AFTER FLAVONE ACETIC-ACID ADMINISTRATION IN MAN AND MOUSE
    CHABOT, GG
    BRANELLEC, D
    SASSI, A
    ARMAND, JP
    GOUYETTE, A
    CHOUAIB, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (05) : 729 - 733