The effects of a limited memory capacity on foraging behavior

被引:36
作者
Belisle, C [1 ]
Cresswell, J [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV EXETER, DEPT BIOL SCI, HATHERLY LABS, EXETER EX4 4PS, DEVON, ENGLAND
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/tpbi.1997.1319
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We introduce a simple mathematical moder to describe the behavior of a forager with a limited memory capacity in the presence of two prey types that differ in their energetic values. The model is used to analyze the effect of memory capacity on foraging behavior and apt foraging energetics and it contrasts with classic optimal foraging theory, which implicitly assumes that the forager has an infinite memory capacity. Classic optimal foraging theory dictates that the tow value prey type should be invariably excluded from the diet when the high value type exceeds some critical relative frequency and invariably consumed otherwise. Our model forager behaves similarly except that, as its memory capacity declines, it is increasingly predisposed to consume the low value prey when it is suboptimal to do so. Nevertheless, our analysis indicates that the energetic efficiency of a forager with an infinite memory capacity can he approximated by a forager with at memory of modest capacity, perhaps one that contains information about 5-20 previously consumed prey items. In our model, memory constraints necessarily result in so-called ''partial preferences'' being exercised towards the low value prey type. Thus, limited memory capacity offers a possible explanation for observed violations of the ''zero-one'' rule of optimal diet composition. We also find a resemblance to a sigmoidal shape in the relationship between the representation of each prey type in the diet acid its relative frequency. Thus, the memory-constrained forager exhibits behavior that resembles the type III functional response. Therefore, it is possible that memory constraints such as we envisage can contribute to the explanation of both partial preferences and functional responses. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 90
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Atkinson R. C., 1968, Psychology of learning and motivation, V2, P89, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3]
[2]   INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT [J].
BERNSTEIN, C ;
KACELNIK, A ;
KREBS, JR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 57 (03) :1007-1026
[3]   A MECHANICAL MODEL FOR HUMAN ATTENTION AND IMMEDIATE MEMORY [J].
BROADBENT, DE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1957, 64 (03) :205-215
[4]   SOME TESTS OF THE DECAY THEORY OF IMMEDIATE MEMORY [J].
BROWN, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1958, 10 (01) :12-21
[5]   A MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SIMPLE LEARNING [J].
BUSH, RR ;
MOSTELLER, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 58 (05) :313-323
[6]   OPTIMAL FORAGING - ATTACK STRATEGY OF A MANTID [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1976, 110 (971) :141-151
[7]   BUMBLEBEE FORAGING BEHAVIOR - CHANGES IN DEPARTURE DECISIONS AS A FUNCTION OF EXPERIMENTAL NECTAR MANIPULATIONS [J].
CIBULA, DA ;
ZIMMERMAN, M .
AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1987, 117 (02) :386-394
[8]   OPTIMAL FORAGING IN GREAT TITS (PARUS-MAJOR) [J].
COWIE, RJ .
NATURE, 1977, 268 (5616) :137-139
[9]  
Dow S.M., 1987, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, V6, P89
[10]   LEARNING CONSTRAINTS AND FLORAL CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN BUMBLE BEES [J].
DUKAS, R ;
REAL, LA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1993, 46 (04) :637-644