Systematic review: proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the healing of reflux oesophagitis - a comparison of esomeprazole with other PPIs

被引:66
作者
Edwards, S. J.
Lind, T.
Lundell, L.
机构
[1] AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Outcomes Res, Luton LU1 3JU, Beds, England
[2] AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03074.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
No randomized controlled trial has compared all the licensed standard dose proton pump inhibitors in the healing of reflux oesophagitis. To compare the effectiveness of esomeprazole with licensed standard dose proton pump inhibitors for healing of reflux oesophagitis (i.e. lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg). Systematic review of CENTRAL, BIOSIS, EMBASE and MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials in patients with reflux oesophagitis. Searching was completed in February 2005. Data on endoscopic healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks were extracted and re-analysed if not analysed by intention-to-treat. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model. Of 133 papers identified in the literature search, six were of sufficient quality to be included in the analysis. No studies were identified comparing rabeprazole with esomeprazole. A meta-analysis of healing rates of esomeprazole 40 mg compared with standard dose proton pump inhibitors gave the following results: at 4 weeks [relative risk (RR) 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90, 0.94; P < 0.00001], and 8 weeks (RR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.97; P < 0.00001). Publication bias did not have a significant impact on the results. The results were robust to changes in the inclusion/exclusion criteria and using a random effects model. Esomeprazole consistently demonstrates higher healing rates when compared with standard dose proton pump inhibitors.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 750
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2000, METAANALYSIS DECISIO
[2]
Castell DO, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P575
[3]
BIAS IN TREATMENT ASSIGNMENT IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
CELANO, P ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (22) :1358-1361
[4]
*COCHR COLL, 2000, REV MAN REVMAN COMP
[5]
METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[6]
Systematic review of proton pump inhibitors for the acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis [J].
Edwards, SJ ;
Lind, T ;
Lundell, L .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 15 (11) :1729-1736
[7]
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[8]
Efficacy of esomeprazole 40 mg vs. lansoprazole 30 mg for healing moderate to severe erosive oesophagitis [J].
Fennerty, MB ;
Johanson, JF ;
Hwang, C ;
Sostek, M .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (04) :455-463
[9]
40 mg pantoprazole and 40 mg esomeprazole are equivalent in the healing of esophageal lesions and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms [J].
Gillessen, A ;
Beil, W ;
Modlin, IM ;
Gatz, G ;
Hole, U .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 38 (04) :332-340
[10]
GREEN JRB, 1993, EUR J CLIN RES, V4, P29