Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500

被引:639
作者
Dyer, W. Gibb, Jr. [1 ]
Whetten, David A.
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Ctr Econ Self Reliance, Marriott Sch Management, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Fac Ctr, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Little is known about the impact of family ownership and management on corporate social performance. Some scholars have suggested that family firms are not likely to act in a socially responsible manner, while others have indicated that socially responsible behavior on the part of the family firm protects the family's assets. This preliminary study compares the degree to which family and nonfamily firms are socially responsible using data from 1991 to 2000 from the S&P 500. Two hundred sixty-one firms (202 nonfamily and 59 family) appeared in the S&P 500 for the 10-year period. Findings show that family firms are more socially responsible than nonfamily firms along several dimensions. This is likely due to family concern about image and reputation and a desire to protect family assets.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 802
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Albert Stuart., 1985, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V7, P263, DOI DOI 10.1177/1059601112473815
  • [2] Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500
    Anderson, RC
    Reeb, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) : 1301 - 1328
  • [3] [Anonymous], J MANAGEMENT STUDIES
  • [4] [Anonymous], IDENTITY ORG DEV THE
  • [5] Banfield EC., 1958, MORAL BASIS BACKWARD
  • [6] Baumeister R.F., 1998, Handbook of social psychology, V1, P680
  • [7] Beehr TA, 1997, J ORGAN BEHAV, V18, P297, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)18:3<297::AID-JOB805>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-D
  • [9] Bowen H., 1953, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILIT, DOI DOI 10.2307/3708003
  • [10] Bragdon JosephH., 1972, Risk Management, V19, P9, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004