On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies

被引:86
作者
Li, JL [1 ]
Fine, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
cohort study; binomial test; conditional versus unconditional power; Fisher's exact test; McNemar's test; random sample size;
D O I
10.1002/sim.1836
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The design of a study of disease screening tests may be based on hypothesis tests for the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. The case-control study requires knowledge of the disease status of patients at the time of enrollment. This may not be possible in a prospective setting, when the gold standard is obtained subsequent to the initial screening and the number of diseased individuals is random and can not be fixed by design. Several ad hoc procedures for determining the total sample size are commonly used by practitioners, for example, the prevalence inflation method. The properties of these methods are not well understood. We develop a formal method for sample size and power calculations based on the unconditional power properties of the test statistics. The approach provides novel insights into the behaviour of the commonly used methods. We find that the ad hoc prevalence inflation method may serve as a useful approximation to our rigorous framework for sample size determination in the prospective set-up. The design of a large population-based study of mammography for breast cancer screening illustrates the key issues. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2550
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of disease [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS ;
Moskowitz, CS .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (06) :835-852
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1973, ART COMPUTER PROGRAM
[3]  
Bradley J. V., 1968, Distribution-free statistical tests (Chapter 12)
[4]   SAMPLE-SIZE FOR TESTING DIFFERENCES IN PROPORTIONS FOR THE PAIRED-SAMPLE DESIGN [J].
CONNOR, RJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1987, 43 (01) :207-211
[5]   ASYMPTOTIC AND EXACT POWER FOR THE MCNEMAR TEST AND ITS ANALOG WITH R CONTROLS PER CASE [J].
DUFFY, SW .
BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (04) :1005-1015
[6]  
FLIESS JL, 1973, STAT METHODS RATES P
[7]   DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZES FOR USE WITH EXACT CONDITIONAL TEST IN 2 X 2 COMPARATIVE TRIALS [J].
GAIL, M ;
GART, JJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1973, 29 (03) :441-448
[8]   MATCHED PAIRS DESIGN IN CASE OF ALL-OR-NONE RESPONSES [J].
MIETTINEN, OS .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :339-+
[9]   Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low [J].
Obuchowski, NA ;
Zhou, XH .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2002, 3 (04) :477-492
[10]   COMPARING NEW AND OLD SCREENING-TESTS WHEN A REFERENCE PROCEDURE CANNOT BE PERFORMED ON ALL SCREENEES - EXAMPLE OF AUTOMATED CYTOMETRY FOR EARLY DETECTION OF CERVICAL-CANCER [J].
SCHATZKIN, A ;
CONNOR, RJ ;
TAYLOR, PR ;
BUNNAG, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 125 (04) :672-678