Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals

被引:59
作者
Costa, Antonia [1 ,2 ]
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo [1 ,2 ]
Costa, Fernanda [1 ]
Santos, Cristina [3 ]
Bernardes, Joao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Hosp S Joao, P-4200319 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Inst Biomed Engn, P-4200319 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Serv Bioestatist & Informat Med, P-4200319 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
cardiotocography; computer assisted; electrocardiography; fetal hypoxia; fetal heart rate; fetal monitoring; WAVE-FORM ANALYSIS; APGAR SCORE; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CESAREAN-SECTION; CARDIOTOCOGRAMS; CLASSIFICATION; ACIDOSIS; INFANTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) and ST event signals in prediction of neonatal acidemia. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred forty-eight FHR tracings were evaluated to identify red alerts provided by the system, based on automated analysis of FHR and ST event signals, and compared with the occurrence of umbilical artery acidemia ( pH <= 7.05). RESULTS: The presence of red alerts obtained sensitivity of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.00), specificity of 0.94 ( 95% CI, 0.89-0.97), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.47 ( 95% CI, 0.22-0.72), negative predictive value (NPV) of 1 ( 95% CI, 0.96-1.00), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 17.6 ( 95% CI, 9.0-34.5), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0. When limiting analysis to red alerts that did not include ST data, sensitivity was 0.57 ( 95% CI, 0.20-0.88), specificity was 0.97 ( 95% CI, 0.92-0.99), PPV was 0.50 ( 95% CI, 0.17-0.82), NPV was 0.98 ( 95% CI, 0.93-0.99), PLR was 20.14 ( 95% CI, 6.3-64.2), and NLR was 0.44 ( 95% CI, 0.19-1.04). CONCLUSION: Computer analysis of FHR and ST event signals provide higher accuracy in predicting neonatal academia.
引用
收藏
页码:464.e1 / 464.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Fetal electrocardiogram:: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance [J].
Amer-Wahlin, I. ;
Arulkumaran, S. ;
Hagberg, H. ;
Marsal, K. ;
Visser, G. H. A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (10) :1191-1193
[2]
Ayres-de Campos D, 2000, J Matern Fetal Med, V9, P311
[3]
Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings:: the anteparturn arm of the SisPorto® multicentre validation study [J].
Ayres-de-Campos, D ;
Costa-Santos, C ;
Bernardes, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 118 (01) :52-60
[4]
Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision [J].
Ayres-De-Campos, D ;
Bernardes, J ;
Costa-Pereira, T ;
Pereira-Leite, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (12) :1307-1310
[5]
Omniview-SisPorto® 3.5 -: a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram plus ST event analysis [J].
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo ;
Sousa, Paulo ;
Costa, Antonia ;
Bernardes, Joao .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (03) :260-264
[6]
AYRESDECAMPOS D, 2007, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V114, P1446
[7]
Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms [J].
Bernardes, J ;
CostaPereira, A ;
AyresdeCampos, D ;
vanGeijn, HP ;
PereiraLeite, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 57 (01) :33-37
[8]
THE PORTO SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED CARDIOTOCOGRAPHIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS [J].
BERNARDES, J ;
MOURA, C ;
DESA, JPM ;
LEITE, LP .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (1-2) :61-65
[9]
The continuing value of the apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. [J].
Casey, BM ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (07) :467-471
[10]
CEMACH, 2006, PER MORT SURV 2004 E