Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC-Norfolk Cohort

被引:110
作者
Simmons, Rebecca K. [1 ]
Coleman, Ruth L. [2 ]
Price, Hermione C. [2 ]
Holman, Rury R. [2 ]
Khaw, Kay-Tee [3 ]
Wareham, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Oxford Ctr Diabet Endocrinol & Metab, Diabet Trials Unit, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Clin Gerontol, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; UNITED-KINGDOM; RECLASSIFICATION; POPULATION; MELLITUS; ADVICE; IMPACT; MODEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2337/dc08-1918
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individuals with nondiabetic hyperglycemia, defined as A1C >= 6.0%; and 3) individuals with normoglycemia defined as A1C <6.0%. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This was a population-based prospective cohort (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk). Participants aged 40-79 years recruited from U.K. general practices attended a health examination (1993-1998) and were followed for CVD events/death until April 2007. CVD risk estimates were calculated for 10,137 individuals. RESULTS - Over 10.1 years, there were 69 CVD events in the diabetes group (25.4%), 160 in the hyperglycemia group (17.7%0), and 732 in the normoglycemia group (8.2%). Estimated CVD 10-year risk in the diabetes group was 33 and 37% using the UKPDS and Framingham equations, respectively. In the hyperglycemia group, estimated CVD risks were 31 and 22%, respectively, and for the normoglycemia group risks were 20 and 14%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ability of the risk equations to discriminate between individuals at different risk of CVD events in each subgroup both equations overestimated CVD risk. The Framingham equations performed better in the hyperglycemia and normoglycemia groups as they did not overestimate risk as much as the UKPDS Risk Engine, and they classified snore participants correctly. CONCLUSIONS - Both the UKPDS Risk Engine and Framingham risk equations were moderately effective at ranking individuals and are therefore suitable for resource prioritization. However, both overestimated true risk, which is important when one is using scores to communicate prognostic information to individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 713
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and the risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary artery disease in adults without prior myocardial infarction or stroke: The EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study [J].
Boekholdt, MS ;
Peters, RJG ;
Day, NE ;
Luben, R ;
Bingham, SA ;
Wareham, NJ ;
Hack, CE ;
Reitsma, PH ;
Khaw, KT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 117 (06) :390-397
[2]   Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review [J].
Brindle, P. ;
Beswick, A. ;
Fahey, T. ;
Ebrahim, S. .
HEART, 2006, 92 (12) :1752-1759
[3]   How do people with Type 2 diabetes perceive and respond to cardiovascular risk? [J].
Carroll, C ;
Naylor, E ;
Marsden, P ;
Dornan, T .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (05) :355-360
[4]  
COLEMAN R, DIABETES S1, V56, pA170
[5]   Framingham, SCORE, and DECODE risk equations do not provide reliable cardiovascular risk estimates in type 2 diabetes [J].
Coleman, Ruth L. ;
Stevens, Richard J. ;
Retnakaran, Ravi ;
Holman, Rury R. .
DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 (05) :1292-1294
[6]   Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial [J].
Colhoun, HM ;
Betteridge, DJ ;
Durrington, PN ;
Hitman, GA ;
Neil, HAW ;
Livingstone, SJ ;
Thomason, MJ ;
Mackness, MI ;
Charlton-Menys, V ;
Fuller, JH .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9435) :685-696
[7]   General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care - The Framingham Heart Study [J].
D'Agostino, Ralph B. ;
Vasan, Ramachandran S. ;
Pencina, Michael J. ;
Wolf, Philip A. ;
Cobain, Mark ;
Massaro, Joseph M. ;
Kannel, William B. .
CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (06) :743-753
[8]  
Day N, 1999, BRIT J CANCER, V80, P95
[9]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[10]   Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Gaede, P ;
Vedel, P ;
Larsen, N ;
Jensen, GVH ;
Parving, H ;
Pedersen, O .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (05) :383-393