A matrix approach to status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution

被引:51
作者
Xu, Haiyan [1 ]
Li, Kevin W. [2 ]
Hipel, Keith W. [1 ]
Kilgour, D. Marc [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[3] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Math, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
关键词
Status quo analysis; Decision support system; Matrix representation; Graph model for conflict resolution; Multiple decision makers; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; PREFERENCE UNCERTAINTY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICT; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amc.2009.02.051
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
An algebraic method is developed to carry out status quo analysis within the framework of the graph model for conflict resolution. As a form of post-stability analysis, status quo analysis aims at confirming that possible equilibria, or states stable for all decision-makers, are in fact reachable from the status quo or any other initial state. Although pseudo-codes for status quo analysis have been developed, they have never been implemented within a practical decision support system. The novel matrix approach to status quo analysis designed here is convenient for computer implementation and easy to employ, as is illustrated by an application to a real-world conflict case. Moveover, the proposed explicit matrix approach reveals an inherent link between status quo analysis and the traditional stability analysis and, hence, provides the possibility of establishing an integrated paradigm for stability and status quo analyses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 480
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bennett Peter., 1995, MERSHON INT STUD REV, V39, P19, DOI [10.2307/222691, DOI 10.2307/222691]
[2]  
Burton J.W., 1993, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, P55
[3]  
Burton JohnW., 1990, CONFLICT PRACTICES M
[4]   Genetic algorithms for rerouting shortest paths in dynamic and stochastic networks [J].
Davies, C ;
Lingras, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 144 (01) :27-38
[5]  
De Bono E., 1985, Conflicts: A better way to resolve them
[6]  
Deutsch M., 2011, The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice
[7]  
Fang L.P., 1993, Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution
[8]   A decision support system for interactive decision making - part 1: Model formulation [J].
Fang, LP ;
Hipel, KW ;
Kilgour, DM ;
Peng, XYJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2003, 33 (01) :42-55
[9]   A decision support system for interactive decision making-part II: Analysis and output interpretation [J].
Fang, LP ;
Hipel, KW ;
Kilgour, DM ;
Peng, XYJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2003, 33 (01) :56-66
[10]   Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts [J].
Hamouda, Luai ;
Kilgour, D. Marc ;
Hipel, Keith W. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2006, 179 (01) :314-327