Neoliberalism and environmental justice in the United States environmental protection agency: Translating policy into managerial practice in hazardous waste remediation

被引:83
作者
Holifield, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Geog, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
environmental justice; neoliberalism; superfund; hazardous waste remediation; Environmental Protection Agency; southeastern United States;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.11.003
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In response to the failings of the aggressive neoliberalism of the Reagan era, the Clinton administration sought new ways to promote and deepen the neoliberal project. One of its strategies was to develop "neocommunitarian" programs to support political empowerment and economic self-sufficiency in marginalized communities. Its environmental justice policy became an important vehicle for delivering these programs. This paper examines ways in which one regional office of the US Environmental Protection Agency translated the Clinton administration's environmental justice policy into practical guidelines for its managers. It investigates how these guidelines affected the work of personnel in the EPA's program to clean up hazardous waste sites. It asks how the Clinton administration's approach to environmental justice-emphasizing data analysis, managed public participation, and economic opportunity-helped both to deepen the neoliberal project and to transform the geography of risk and remediation. Although the EPA was unable to "normalize" the environmental justice community-to make it a standardized target for the Clinton administration's empowerment programs-its environmental justice policy both contributed to subtle changes in the distribution of hazardous waste risk and made the delivery of neocommunitarian programs an important part of the work of remedial personnel. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 297
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Environmental equity in superfund - Demographics of the discovery and prioritization of abandoned toxic sites [J].
Anderton, DL ;
Oakes, JM ;
Egan, KL .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1997, 21 (01) :3-26
[2]  
BARNETT HC, 1994, TOXIC DEBTS SUPERFUN
[3]   Cities and the geographies of "actually existing neoliberalism" [J].
Brenner, N ;
Theodore, N .
ANTIPODE, 2002, 34 (03) :349-379
[4]  
Bullard RobertD., 1994, DUMPING DIXIE RACE C
[5]   PRODUCTION AND EXTRAPOLATION OF MEANING IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT [J].
CABLE, S ;
SHRIVER, T .
SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 1995, 15 (04) :419-442
[6]   THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE FRAME - A CONCEPTUAL DISCUSSION AND AN APPLICATION [J].
CAPEK, SM .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1993, 40 (01) :5-24
[7]  
CLINTON WJ, FEDERAL ACTIONS ADDR
[8]   The role of geographic scale in monitoring environmental justice [J].
Cutter, SL ;
Holm, D ;
Clark, L .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1996, 16 (04) :517-526
[9]  
Di Chiro G., 1998, The struggle for ecological democracy, P104
[10]  
DiChiro G, 1995, UNCOMMON GROUND, P298