Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae

被引:88
作者
Autumn, Kellar [1 ]
Hansen, Wendy [1 ]
机构
[1] Lewis & Clark Coll, Dept Biol, Portland, OR 97219 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY | 2006年 / 192卷 / 11期
关键词
adhesion; contact mechanics; locomotion; reptilia; nanotechnology;
D O I
10.1007/s00359-006-0149-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Geckos may represent the world's most demanding adhesives application. The adhesive setae on the toes of climbing geckos must adhere strongly yet avoid fouling or attachment at inappropriate times. We tested the hypothesis that gecko setae are non-adhesive in their unloaded default state by comparing the water droplet contact angle (theta) of isolated setal arrays to the smooth surface of eye spectacle scales of tokay geckos (Gekko gecko). At equilibrium, theta was 98.3 +/- 3.4 degrees in spectacle scales of live geckos and 93.3 +/- 3.5 degrees in isolated spectacles. Isolated setal arrays were ultrahydrophobic, with theta of 160.6 +/- 1.3 degrees (means +/- SD). The difference in theta of setal arrays and smooth spectacles indicates a very low contact fraction. Using Cassie's law of surface wettability, we infer that less than 6.6% of the surface of unloaded setae is solid and at least 93.4% is air space. We calculated that the contact fraction must increase from 6.6% in the unloaded state to 46% in the loaded state to account for previously measured values of adhesion. Thus gecko setae may be non-sticky by default because only a very small contact fraction is possible without mechanically deforming the setal array.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1212
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Ultrastructural autoradiographic and immunocytochemical analysis of setae formation and keratinization in the digital pads of the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus (Gekkonidae, Reptilia)
    Alibardi, L
    [J]. TISSUE & CELL, 2003, 35 (04) : 288 - 296
  • [2] From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices
    Arzt, E
    Gorb, S
    Spolenak, R
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (19) : 10603 - 10606
  • [3] Towards a micromechanical understanding of biological surface devices
    Arzt, E
    Enders, S
    Gorb, S
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR METALLKUNDE, 2002, 93 (05): : 345 - 351
  • [4] Dynamics of geckos running vertically
    Autumn, K
    Hsieh, ST
    Dudek, DM
    Chen, J
    Chitaphan, C
    Full, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (02) : 260 - 272
  • [5] Autumn K, 2005, PROC SPIE, V5804, P291, DOI 10.1117/12.506157
  • [6] Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos
    Autumn, K
    Peattie, AM
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 42 (06) : 1081 - 1090
  • [7] Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae
    Autumn, K
    Sitti, M
    Liang, YCA
    Peattie, AM
    Hansen, WR
    Sponberg, S
    Kenny, TW
    Fearing, R
    Israelachvili, JN
    Full, RJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (19) : 12252 - 12256
  • [8] Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair
    Autumn, K
    Liang, YA
    Hsieh, ST
    Zesch, W
    Chan, WP
    Kenny, TW
    Fearing, R
    Full, RJ
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 405 (6787) : 681 - +
  • [9] ADHESION - MECHANISMS THAT ASSIST OR IMPEDE IT
    BAIER, RE
    SHAFRIN, EG
    ZISMAN, WA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1968, 162 (3860) : 1360 - &
  • [10] Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces
    Barthlott, W
    Neinhuis, C
    [J]. PLANTA, 1997, 202 (01) : 1 - 8