Objectives: Incontinence after radical prostatectomy is addressed to sphincter damage and/or bladder dysfunction. Taking into account a high cure rate of incontinence by pelvic floor biofeedback treatment, the search for further mechanisms of a complex physiological concept seems feasible. Methods: To characterize pelvic floor function, 18 patients were prospectively evaluated before and after radical prostatectomy by clinical neurourological tests, urodynamics and needle/surface electromyography (EMG). Results: In all patients (mean age 62 years) investigations were completed successfully. The outcomes of neurourological investigations (sacral reflexes, voluntary pelvic floor contraction and relaxation) and needle EMG showed no significant changes in the pre-/postoperative comparison. Only by using surface EMG polygraphy change of activation patterns during pelvic floor contraction (decreased mean and medium frequency) could be found. Conclusion: in patients without preexisting bladder dysfunction and with a basically normal operative and postoperative course, fine motoric changes of pelvic floor function are the main finding. This cannot be explained by a pure anatomical approach. Neurophysiological events, like a barrage of nociceptive information, caused by surgical dissection and an inflammatory reaction due to the healing process, contribute to altered processing within the central nervous system. The appreciation of these mechanisms, well studied in neuroscience and pain research, offers a better understanding of surgery-related short- and longterm morbidity after pelvic surgery, i.e., urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.