Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: A changing paradigm

被引:65
作者
Klotz, DA [1 ]
Winkle, MR [1 ]
Richmon, J [1 ]
Hengerer, AS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Div Otolaryngol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
epistaxis; nasal packing; embolization; nose bleed;
D O I
10.1097/00005537-200209000-00008
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective. To demonstrate that surgery, as the initial treatment option for posterior epistaxis, can provide comparable success and complication rates to nonsurgical management with fewer associated costs. Study Design: A retrospective chart review and cost analysis. Methods: Two hundred three consecutive charts were reviewed for patient outcome, complications, and hospitalization time. Average costs were calculated from hospital department and physician fee schedules. Results: Average success rate of all surgical procedures performed for posterior epistaxis was 90%, anterior-posterior packing success was 62%, and embolization success was 75%. The packing-only group had a significantly greater mean hospitalization time (5.29 d) than patients who were treated either surgically (2.1 d) or with embolization (2.6 d). The average per-patient admission charges were, for successful posterior packing, $5136 per patient; for surgical treatment, $3851 per patient; and for embolization, $5697 per patient. Surgery offered a cost savings of $1846 per patient over traditional packing. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups. Conclusion: The review suggests that a better success rate, a comparable complication rate, and a cost savings can be achieved with surgical intervention as the first-line treatment for intractable epistaxis when compared with traditional anterior-posterior packing and embolization.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1582
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Effectiveness of surgical management of epistaxis at a tertiary care center [J].
Barlow, DW ;
Deleyiannis, WB ;
Pinczower, EF .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (01) :21-24
[2]   EFFECTIVE TREATMENT PROTOCOL FOR POSTERIOR EPISTAXIS - A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE [J].
CANNON, CR .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1993, 109 (04) :722-725
[3]   CHANGES IN ARTERIAL OXYGEN TENSION AND PULMONARY MECHANICS WITH USE OF POSTERIOR PACKING IN EPISTAXIS - PRELIMINARY REPORT [J].
CASSISI, NJ ;
BILLER, HF ;
OGURA, JH .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1971, 81 (08) :1261-&
[4]   Comparison of internal maxillary artery ligation versus embolization for refractory posterior epistaxis [J].
Cullen, MM ;
Tami, TA .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1998, 118 (05) :636-642
[5]   THE FOLEY CATHETER IN EPISTAXIS MANAGEMENT - A SCIENTIFIC APPRAISAL [J].
HARTLEY, C ;
AXON, PR .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1994, 108 (05) :399-402
[6]  
HERZON FS, 1971, ARCHIV OTOLARYNGOL, V94, P317
[7]  
JACOBS JR, 1981, LARYNGOSCOPE, V91, P279
[8]  
JOHNSON F, 1956, ARCHIV OTOLARYNGOL, V63, P295
[9]   EPISTAXIS, MEDICAL HISTORY, AND THE NASOPULMONARY REFLEX - WHAT IS CLINICALLY RELEVANT [J].
LOFTUS, BC ;
BLITZER, A ;
COZINE, K .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1994, 110 (04) :363-369
[10]   INTRANASAL BALLOON CATHETERS - HOW DO THEY WORK [J].
MCGARRY, GW ;
AITKEN, D .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1991, 16 (04) :388-392