Ultrasonic Scaler Oscillations and Tooth-surface Defects

被引:40
作者
Lea, S. C. [1 ]
Felver, B. [1 ]
Landini, G. [1 ]
Walmsley, A. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Dent, Birmingham B4 6NN, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
periodontology; ultrasonic scaler; vibration; performance; laser vibrometry; laser profilometry; tooth-surface damage; IN-VITRO; SUBSTANCE REMOVAL; DISPLACEMENT AMPLITUDE; WORKING PARAMETERS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1177/0022034508330267
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Damage to tooth root surfaces may occur during ultrasonic cleaning with both piezoelectric and magnetostrictive ultrasonic scalers. It is unclear which mechanism causes more damage or how their mechanism of action leads to such damage. Our null hypothesis is that tooth-surface defect dimensions, resulting from instrumentation with ultrasonic scalers, are independent of whether the scaler probe is magnetostrictive or piezoelectric. Piezoelectric and magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler probes were placed into contact against polished dentin samples (100 g/200 g). Resulting tooth surfaces were evaluated with a laser metrology system. Ultrasonic instrumentation produced an indentation directly related to the bodily movement of the probe as it made an impact on the surface. Load, generator power, and probe cross-section significantly affected probe vibration and defect depth/volume. Defect dimensions were independent of generator type. Magnetostrictive probes oscillated with greater displacement amplitudes than piezoelectric probes, but produced similar defects. This may be due to the cross-sectional shape of the probes.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 234
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument [J].
Busslinger, A ;
Lampe, K ;
Beuchat, M ;
Lehmann, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 28 (07) :642-649
[2]  
CROSSPOLINE GN, 1995, AM J DENT, V8, P131
[3]   Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. [J].
Flemmig T.F. ;
Petersilka G.J. ;
Mehl A. ;
Rüdiger S. ;
Hickel R. ;
Klaiber B. .
Clinical Oral Investigations, 1997, 1 (2) :55-60
[4]   Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro [J].
Flemmig, TF ;
Petersilka, GJ ;
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Klaiber, B .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (05) :547-553
[5]   The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro [J].
Flemmig, TF ;
Petersilka, GJ ;
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Klaiber, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 25 (02) :158-163
[6]   Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: An in vitro study [J].
Folwaczny, M ;
Merkel, U ;
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (09) :1221-1226
[7]   Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study [J].
Jepsen, S ;
Ayna, M ;
Hedderich, J ;
Eberhard, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (11) :1003-1006
[8]   COMPARATIVE INVITRO STUDIES OF SONIC, ULTRASONIC AND RECIPROCATING SCALING INSTRUMENTS [J].
JOTIKASTHIRA, NE ;
LIE, T ;
LEKNES, KN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1992, 19 (08) :560-569
[9]   Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro [J].
Khosravi, M ;
Bahrami, ZS ;
Atabaki, MSJ ;
Shokrgozar, MA ;
Shokri, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (03) :160-165
[10]  
Lea SC, 2006, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V33, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00861.x