Human population density and extinction risk in the world's carnivores

被引:421
作者
Cardillo, M [1 ]
Purvis, A
Sechrest, W
Gittleman, JL
Bielby, J
Mace, GM
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Biol Sci, Ascot, Berks, England
[2] Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London NW1 4RY, England
[3] IUCN, Global Mammal Assessment, Species Survival Commiss, Washington, DC USA
[4] Conservat Int, Ctr Appl Biodivers, Conservat Int, Appl Biodivers Sci Biodivers Assessment Unit, Washington, DC USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Biol, Charlottesville, VA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Understanding why some species are at high risk of extinction, while others remain relatively safe, is central to the development of a predictive conservation science. Recent studies have shown that a species' extinction risk may be determined by two types of factors: intrinsic biological traits and exposure to external anthropogenic threats. However, little is known about the relative and interacting effects of intrinsic and external variables on extinction risk. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we show that extinction risk in the mammal order Carnivora is predicted more strongly by biology than exposure to high-density human populations. However, biology interacts with human population density to determine extinction risk: biological traits explain 80% of variation in risk for carnivore species with high levels of exposure to human populations, compared to 45% for carnivores generally. The results suggest that biology will become a more critical determinant of risk as human populations expand. We demonstrate how a model predicting extinction risk from biology can be combined with projected human population density to identify species likely to move most rapidly towards extinction by the year 2030. African viverrid species are particularly likely to become threatened, even though most are currently considered relatively safe. We suggest that a preemptive approach to species conservation is needed to identify and protect species that may not be threatened at present but may become so in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 914
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Extinction filters and current resilience: The significance of past selection pressures for conservation biology [J].
Balmford, A .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1996, 11 (05) :193-196
[2]   Conservation conflicts across Africa [J].
Balmford, A ;
Moore, JL ;
Brooks, T ;
Burgess, N ;
Hansen, LA ;
Williams, P ;
Rahbek, C .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5513) :2616-2619
[3]   Variation in extinction risk among birds: Chance or evolutionary predisposition? [J].
Bennett, PM ;
Owens, IPF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 264 (1380) :401-408
[4]   Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia) [J].
Bininda-Emonds, ORP ;
Gittleman, JL ;
Purvis, A .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1999, 74 (02) :143-175
[5]   Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in West Africa [J].
Brashares, JS ;
Arcese, P ;
Sam, MK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1484) :2473-2478
[6]   A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density [J].
Carbone, C ;
Gittleman, JL .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5563) :2273-2276
[7]   Biological determinants of extinction risk: why are smaller species less vulnerable? [J].
Cardillo, M .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 6 :63-69
[8]   Body size and risk of extinction in Australian mammals [J].
Cardillo, M ;
Bromham, L .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) :1435-1440
[9]   Mammal population losses and the extinction crisis [J].
Ceballos, G ;
Ehrlich, PR .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5569) :904-907
[10]  
CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network), 2000, GRIDD POP WORLD VERS