Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma

被引:36
作者
Lam, John S. [1 ]
Belldegrun, Arie S. [1 ]
Pantuck, Allan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
adrenalectomy; kidney cancer; lymphadenectomy; laparoscopy; nephron-sparing surgery; nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-006-0055-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It has been 35 years since the radical nephrectomy was standardized by the work of Robson et al. (J Urol 101:297-301, 1969). Despite being based on a retrospective review of only 88 cases operated upon over a span of 15 years, this publication was an important milestone in the attempt to create uniformity in the staging of Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the measurement of surgical outcomes for RCC. Although this manuscript forms the basis for our contemporary measurement of the long-term results of RCC surgery and set the standard to which the entire subsequent literature was compared, contemporary research subsequently has questioned many of Robson's conclusions regarding RCC. In Robson's era, the majority of patients presented with large, symptomatic tumors, pre-operative staging was imprecise, and many patients had locally advanced disease at the time of surgery: of the 88 patients in Robson's series, 75% were managed through a thoracoabdominal incision. Since that time, advances in renal imaging and clinical staging have led to the increased detection of incidental, lower stage, organ-confined tumors more amendable to expanded surgical options. Surgical techniques have evolved and technological advances have made possible new methods of managing renal tumors in situ that have emphasized a transition from radical to less extirpative approaches. In addition, understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer has led to improved prognostication and the development of effective immunotherapies for advanced disease. The current concepts and long-term outcomes of the surgical management of RCC will be reviewed to help elucidate some of these changes, from the evolution of open to laparoscopic to percutaneous, from radical to partial to ablative approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 266
页数:12
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]   Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy [J].
Abbou, CC ;
Cicco, A ;
Gasman, D ;
Hoznek, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Chopin, DK ;
Salomon, L .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (06) :1776-1780
[2]   NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY FOR RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA WITH VENOUS INVOLVEMENT [J].
ANGERMEIER, KW ;
NOVICK, AC ;
STREEM, SB ;
MONTIE, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (06) :1352-1355
[3]  
[Anonymous], J UROL 1
[4]  
BECKER F, 2005, EUR UROL
[5]   Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: Analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system [J].
Belldegrun, A ;
Tsui, KH ;
deKernion, JB ;
Smith, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2868-2875
[6]   Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: Acute and long-term clinical, radiographic, and pathologic effects in an animal model and application in a clinical trial [J].
Bishoff, JT ;
Chen, RB ;
Lee, BR ;
Chan, DY ;
Huso, D ;
Rodriguez, R ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Marshall, FF .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) :233-239
[7]   Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph node dissection:: Preliminary results of the EORTC randomized phase III protocol 30881 [J].
Blom, JHM ;
van Poppel, H ;
Marechal, JM ;
Jacqmin, D ;
Sylvester, R ;
Schröder, FH ;
de Prijck, L .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (06) :570-575
[8]  
BOSNIAK MA, 1986, RADIOLOGY, V158, P1
[9]   MANAGEMENT OF SMALL UNILATERAL RENAL-CELL CARCINOMAS - RADICAL VERSUS NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY [J].
BUTLER, BP ;
NOVICK, AC ;
MILLER, DP ;
CAMPBELL, SA ;
LICHT, MR .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (01) :34-40
[10]   Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: Evaluation of efficacy and safety: A multicenter experience [J].
Cadeddu, JA ;
Ono, Y ;
Clayman, RV ;
Barrett, PH ;
Janetschek, G ;
Fentie, DD ;
McDougall, EM ;
Moore, RG ;
Kinukawa, T ;
Elbahnasy, AM ;
Nelson, JB ;
Kavoussi, LR .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (05) :773-777