Attributions for thought suppression failure in obsessive-compulsive disorder

被引:44
作者
Tolin, DF
Abramowitz, JS
Hamlin, C
Foa, EB
Synodi, DS
机构
[1] Inst Living, Anxiety Disorders Ctr, Hartford, CT 06106 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
obsessive-compulsive disorder; thought suppression; cognitions; anxiety;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016559117950
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Cognitive-behavioral models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) posit that OCD is mediated, in part, by the paradoxical effects of thought suppression. This theory is based largely on research using nonclinical participants indicating that attempting to suppress thoughts may cause a paradoxical increase in the frequency of that thought. Previous research using OCD patients (OCs) suggests that OCs are more likely than non-OCs to rely on thought suppression, and that they show a greater paradoxical effect than do non-OCs. It is also possible that OCs react more negatively toward thought suppression failure than do non-OCs. In this study, OCs, nonanxious controls (NACs), and anxious controls (ACs) were asked to suppress thoughts of a white bear. Thirty-six participants who reported at least 1 "suppressed" thought during the suppression period were assessed for change in their emotions, as well as for their beliefs about why they were unable to completely suppress the thought. OCs, NACs, and ACs did not differ in their immediate emotional reaction to thought suppression failure. However, OCs reported greater belief in internal, negative attributions of their suppression failure (e. g., "I am mentally weak") than did NACs. Results are discussed in terms of current cognitive-behavioral models and interventions for OCD.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 517
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies [J].
Abramowitz, JS ;
Tolin, DF ;
Street, GP .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 21 (05) :683-703
[2]   Strategies of thought control in obsessive-compulsive disorder [J].
Amir, N ;
Cashman, L ;
Foa, EB .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (08) :775-777
[3]  
[Anonymous], CURRENT CONTROVERSIE
[4]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[5]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[6]  
DAVIDSON JRT, 1991, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V52, P48
[7]   The Brief Social Phobia Scale: A psychometric evaluation [J].
Davidson, JRT ;
Miner, CM ;
DeVeaughGeiss, J ;
Tupler, LA ;
Colket, JT ;
Potts, NLS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (01) :161-166
[8]  
First M. B., 1995, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[9]  
Freeston M.H., 1999, COGN BEHAV PRACT, V6, P362, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1077-7229, DOI 10.1016/S1077-7229(99)80056-X, 10.1016/S1077-7229(99)80056-X]
[10]   BELIEFS ABOUT OBSESSIONAL THOUGHTS [J].
FREESTON, MH ;
LADOUCEUR, R ;
GAGNON, F ;
THIBODEAU, N .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1993, 15 (01) :1-21