Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer

被引:828
作者
Buyse, Marc
Loi, Sherene
van't Veer, Laura
Viale, Giuseppe
Delorenzi, Mauro
Glas, Annuska M.
d'Assignies, Mahasti Saghatchian
Bergh, Jonas
Lidereau, Rosette
Ellis, Paul
Harris, Adrian
Bogaerts, Jan
Therasse, Patrick
Floore, Arno
Amakrane, Mohamed
Piette, Fanny
Rutgers, Emiel
Sotiriou, Christos
Cardoso, Fatima
Piccart, Martine J.
机构
[1] Inst Jules Bordet, BIG TRANSBIG Secretariat, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Int Inst Drug Dev, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] European Inst Oncol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milan, Sch Med, Milan, Italy
[6] Swiss Inst Expt Canc Res, Natl Ctr Competence Res Mol Oncol, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
[7] Swiss Inst Bioinformat, Lausanne, Switzerland
[8] Agendia BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Inst Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
[10] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[11] INSERM, St Cloud, France
[12] Ctr Rene Huguenin, St Cloud, France
[13] Guys Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
[14] John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[15] European Org Res & Treatment Canc Data Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2006年 / 98卷 / 17期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj329
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. A 70-gene signature was previously shown to have prognostic value in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Our goal was to validate the signature in an independent group of patients. Methods: Patients (n = 307, with 137 events after a median follow-up of 13.6 years) from five European centers were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the gene signature classification and on clinical risk classifications. Patients were assigned to the gene signature low-risk group if their 5-year distant metastasis-free survival probability as estimated by the gene signature was greater than 90%. Patients were assigned to the clinicopathologic low-risk group if their 10-year survival probability, as estimated by Adjuvant! software, was greater than 88% (for estrogen receptor [ER]-positive patients) or 92% (for ER-negative patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated to compare time to distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival in high- versus low-risk groups. Results: The 70-gene signature outperformed the clinicopathologic risk assessment in predicting all endpoints. For time to distant metastases, the gene signature yielded FIR = 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35 to 4.00) without adjustment for clinical risk and hazard ratios ranging from 2.13 to 2.15 after adjustment for various estimates of clinical risk; clinicopathologic risk using Adjuvant! software yielded an unadjusted FIR = 1.68 (95% CI = 0.92 to 3.07). For overall survival, the gene signature yielded an unadjusted HR = 2.79 (95% CI = 1.60 to 4.87) and adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.63 to 2.89; clinicopathologic risk yielded an unadjusted FIR = 1.67 (95% CI = 0.93 to 2.98). For patients in the gene signature high-risk group, 10-year overall survival was 0.69 for patients in both the low- and high-clinical risk groups; for patients in the gene signature low-risk group, the 10-year survival rates were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusions: The 70-gene signature adds independent prognostic information to clinicopathologic risk assessment for patients with early breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1192
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] BOGAERTS J, 2006, IN PRESS NAT CLIN PR
  • [3] Microarray technology and its effect on breast cancer (re)classification and prediction of outcome
    Cardoso, F
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (06) : 303 - 304
  • [4] Good Old clinical markers have similar power in breast cancer prognosis as microarray gene expression profilers
    Edén, P
    Ritz, C
    Rose, C
    Fernö, M
    Peterson, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (12) : 1837 - 1841
  • [5] Eifel P, 2001, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V93, P979
  • [6] Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set?
    Ein-Dor, L
    Kela, I
    Getz, G
    Givol, D
    Domany, E
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (02) : 171 - 178
  • [7] Elston C W, 2002, Histopathology, V41, P154
  • [8] Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer
    Foekens, JA
    Atkins, D
    Zhang, Y
    Sweep, FCGJ
    Harbeck, N
    Paradiso, A
    Cufer, T
    Sieuwerts, AM
    Talantov, D
    Span, PN
    Tjan-Heijnen, VCG
    Zito, AF
    Specht, K
    Hoefler, H
    Golouh, R
    Schittulli, F
    Schmitt, M
    Beex, LVAM
    Klijn, IGM
    Wang, YX
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (11) : 1665 - 1671
  • [9] Meeting highlights:: Updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer
    Goldhirsch, A
    Wood, WC
    Gelber, RD
    Coates, AS
    Thürlimann, B
    Senn, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) : 3357 - 3365
  • [10] Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer
    Harvey, JM
    Clark, GM
    Osborne, CK
    Allred, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) : 1474 - 1481