Comparison of in situ and in vitro techniques for measuring ruminal degradation of animal by-product proteins

被引:12
作者
England, ML
Broderick, GA
Shaver, RD
Combs, DK
机构
[1] USDA ARS,US DAIRY FORAGE RES CTR,MADISON,WI 53706
[2] UNIV WISCONSIN,DEPT DAIRY SCI,MADISON,WI 53706
关键词
in vitro; in situ; ruminal protein degradation;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76258-1
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 [畜牧学];
摘要
Ruminally undegraded protein (RUP) values of blood meal (n = 2), hydrolyzed feather meal (n = 2), fish meal (n = 2), meat and bone meal, and soybean meal were estimated using an in situ method, an inhibitor in vitro method, and an inhibitor in vitro technique applying Michaelis-Menten saturation kinetics. Degradation rates for in situ and inhibitor in vitro methods were calculated by regression of the natural log of the proportion of crude protein (CP) remaining undegraded versus time. Nonlinear regression analysis of the integrated Michaelis-Menten equation was used to determine maximum velocity, the Michaelis constant, and degradation rate (the ratio of maximum velocity to the Michaelis constant). A ruminal passage rate of 0.06/h was assumed in the calculation of RUP. The in situ and inhibitor in vitro techniques yielded similar estimates of ruminal degradation. Mean RUP estimated for soybean meal, blood meal, hydrolyzed feather meal, fish meal, and meat and bone meal were, respectively, 28.6, 86.0, 77.4, 52.9, and 52.6% of CP by the in situ method and 26.4, 86.1, 76.0, 59.6, and 49.5% of CP by the inhibitor in vitro technique. The Michaelis-Menten inhibitor in vitro technique yielded more rapid CP degradation rates and decreased estimates of RUP. The inhibitor in vitro method required less time and labor than did the other two techniques to estimate the RUP values of animal by-product proteins. Results from in vitro incubations with pepsin HCl suggested that low postruminal digestibility of hydrolyzed feather meal may impair its value as a source of RUP.
引用
收藏
页码:2925 / 2931
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1989, Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle
[2]
*ASS OFF AN CHEM, 1990, OFF METH AN, V1
[4]
Ruminal in vitro degradation of protein in tannin-free and tannin-containing forage legume species [J].
Broderick, GA ;
Albrecht, KA .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (06) :1884-1891
[5]
BRODERICK GA, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P1739
[6]
AUTOMATED SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA AND TOTAL AMINO-ACIDS IN RUMINAL FLUID AND INVITRO MEDIA [J].
BRODERICK, GA ;
KANG, JH .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1980, 63 (01) :64-75
[7]
RUMEN PROTEIN-DEGRADATION RATES ESTIMATED BY NONLINEAR-REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF MICHAELIS-MENTEN INVITRO DATA [J].
BRODERICK, GA ;
CLAYTON, MK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1992, 67 (01) :27-42
[8]
BRODERICK GA, 1992, J DAIRY SCI, V75, P174, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77751-0
[9]
INFLUENCE OF IN SITU BAG RINSING TECHNIQUE ON DETERMINATION OF DRY-MATTER DISAPPEARANCE [J].
CHERNEY, DJR ;
PATTERSON, JA ;
LEMENAGER, RP .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1990, 73 (02) :391-397
[10]
EFFECT OF HEAT-TREATMENT ON TRUE DIGESTIBILITY IN THE RAT, INVITRO PROTEOLYSIS AND AVAILABLE LYSINE CONTENT OF COTTONSEED MEAL PROTEIN [J].
CRAIG, WM ;
BRODERICK, GA .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1981, 52 (02) :292-301