Relationships between defoliation, canopy reflectance and pod yield in the peanut-late leafspot pathosystem

被引:48
作者
Nutter, FW [1 ]
Littrell, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV GEORGIA,COASTAL PLAIN EXPT STN,TIFTON,GA 30793
关键词
Arachis hypogaea; Cercosporidium personatum; crop loss; multispectral radiometry; remote sensing; yield loss modeling;
D O I
10.1016/0261-2194(95)00084-4
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Defoliation of peanut (caused by Cercosporidium personatum), and reflected radiation (800 nm wavelength) of sunlight from peanut canopies, were assessed weekly beginning approximately 60 days after planting. Visual and reflectance assessments obtained with a hand-held, multispectral radiometer continued until one week prior to digging. Critical-point yield-loss models were developed using either percentage defoliation or percentage reflectance values as the independent variable and pod yield (kg ha(-1)) as the dependent variable. Yield reductions in the four experiments ranged from 52.9 to 79.0%. Based upon coefficients of determination and the standard errors for predicted y-values (yield), the best critical-point models for either assessment method were obtained when peanuts were assessed 2-3 weeks prior to digging. Critical point models using percent reflectance data as the independent variable explained more of the variation in peanut pod yield and had lower standard errors of the y-estimate than critical point models using percent defoliation values as the independent variable. Percent reflectance values explained 96.3-99.3% of the variation in biomass. This study supports the hypothesis that measurements of healthy green leaf area (as estimated by percent reflectance) have a better relationship with pod yield than defoliation based assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YIELD LOSS AND SEVERITY OF EARLY AND LATE LEAFSPOT DISEASES OF PEANUT [J].
BACKMAN, PA ;
CRAWFORD, MA .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1984, 74 (09) :1101-1103
[2]  
Campbell G. S., 1989, Plant Canopies: their growth, form and function., P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511752308.002
[3]   RADIATION ABSORPTION, GROWTH AND YIELD OF CEREALS [J].
GALLAGHER, JN ;
BISCOE, PV .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1978, 91 (AUG) :47-60
[4]   TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING INTERCEPTED AND ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION IN CORN CANOPIES [J].
GALLO, KP ;
DAUGHTRY, CST .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (04) :752-756
[5]  
GAUNT RE, 1980, U MINN AGR EXP STA M, V7
[7]  
HANSEN JG, 1991, EPPO B, V21, P651
[8]   REMOTE DETECTION OF CROP STRESS - APPLICATION TO PLANT PATHOLOGY [J].
HATFIELD, JL .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1990, 80 (01) :37-39
[9]   CORRELATION BETWEEN INTERCEPTED RADIATION AND YIELD OF POTATO CROPS INFESTED BY PHYTOPHTHORA-INFESTANS IN CENTRAL-AFRICA [J].
HAVERKORT, AJ ;
BICAMUMPAKA, M .
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1986, 92 (05) :239-247
[10]   ASSESSING THE INTERCEPTION OF PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION IN WINTER-WHEAT [J].
HIPPS, LE ;
ASRAR, G ;
KANEMASU, ET .
AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 1983, 28 (03) :253-259