Effect of the duration of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response in patients with low back pain

被引:57
作者
Hamza, MA [1 ]
Ghoname, EA [1 ]
White, PF [1 ]
Craig, WF [1 ]
Ahmed, HE [1 ]
Gajraj, NM [1 ]
Vakharia, AS [1 ]
Noe, CE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Eugene McDermott Ctr Pain Management, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
关键词
electroanalgesia; lumbago; stimulation interval;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199912000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves produces acute analgesic effects. This randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study was designed to evaluate the effect of differing durations of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response to percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in 75 consenting patients with low back pain. Methods: All patients received electrical stimulation for four different time intervals (0, 15, 30, and 45 min) in a random sequence over the course of an 11-week study period. All active percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatments were administered using alternating frequencies of 15 and 30 Hz three times per week for 2 consecutive weeks, The prestudy assessments included the health status survey short form questionnaire and 10-cm visual analog scale scores for pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep, with 0 being the best and 10 being the worst. The pain scoring was repeated 5-10 min after each 60-min study session and 24 h after the last treatment session with each of the four methods. The daily oral analgesic requirements were assessed during each of the four treatment blocks. At the end of each 2-week treatment block, the questionnaire was repeated. Results: Electrical stimulation using percutaneously placed needles produced short-term improvements in the visual ana-log scale pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep scores, and a reduction in the oral analgesic requirements. The 30-min and 45-min durations of electrical stimulation produced similar hypoalgesic effects (48 +/- 21% and 46 +/- 19%, respectively) and were significantly more effective than either 15 min (21 +/- 17%) or 0 min (10 +/- 11%). The 30- and 45-min treatments were also more effective in improving physical activity and sleep scores over the course of the 2-week treatment period. In contrast to the sham treatment (0 min), the health status survey short form revealed that electrical stimulation for 15 to 45 min three times per week for 2 weeks improved patient function. Conclusion: The recommended duration of electrical stimulation with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy is 30 min.
引用
收藏
页码:1622 / 1627
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: An alternative to antiviral drugs for acute herpes zoster [J].
Ahmed, HE ;
Craig, WF ;
White, PF ;
Ghoname, ESA ;
Hamza, MA ;
Gajraj, NM ;
Taylor, SM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (04) :911-914
[2]  
ANDERSSON S A, 1975, American Journal of Chinese Medicine, V3, P311, DOI 10.1142/S0192415X75000396
[3]   ELECTRO-ACUPUNCTURE - EFFECT ON PAIN THRESHOLD MEASURED WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF TEETH [J].
ANDERSSON, SA ;
ERICSON, T ;
HOLMGREN, E ;
LINDQVIST, G .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1973, 63 (DEC7) :393-396
[4]   ANALGESIA INDUCED BY ELECTROACUPUNCTURE OF DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES IS MEDIATED BY DIFFERENT TYPES OF OPIOID RECEPTORS - ANOTHER CROSS-TOLERANCE STUDY [J].
CHEN, XH ;
HAN, JS .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1992, 47 (02) :143-149
[5]   PROLONGED INHIBITION OF PRIMATE SPINOTHALAMIC TRACT CELLS BY PERIPHERAL-NERVE STIMULATION [J].
CHUNG, JM ;
FANG, ZR ;
HORI, Y ;
LEE, KH ;
WILLIS, WD .
PAIN, 1984, 19 (03) :259-275
[6]   FACTORS INFLUENCING PERIPHERAL-NERVE STIMULATION PRODUCED INHIBITION OF PRIMATE SPINOTHALAMIC TRACT CELLS [J].
CHUNG, JM ;
LEE, KH ;
HORI, Y ;
ENDO, K ;
WILLIS, WD .
PAIN, 1984, 19 (03) :277-293
[7]   TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION AND ACUPUNCTURE - COMPARISON OF TREATMENT FOR LOW-BACK PAIN [J].
FOX, EJ ;
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1976, 2 (02) :141-148
[8]   BACK PAIN AND SCIATICA [J].
FRYMOYER, JW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (05) :291-300
[9]   The effect of stimulus frequency on the analgesic response to percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Ghoname, EA ;
Craig, WF ;
White, PF ;
Ahmed, HE ;
Hamza, MA ;
Gajraj, NM ;
Vakharia, AS ;
Noe, CE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) :841-846
[10]   Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain - A randomized crossover study [J].
Ghoname, ESA ;
Craig, WF ;
White, PF ;
Ahmed, HE ;
Hamza, MA ;
Henderson, BN ;
Gajraj, NM ;
Huber, PJ ;
Gatchel, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (09) :818-823