CT colonography: Multiobserver diagnostic performance

被引:49
作者
McFarland, EG
Pilgram, TK
Brink, JA
McDermott, RA
Santillan, CV
Brady, PW
Heiken, JP
Balfe, DM
Weinstock, LB
Thyssen, EP
Littenberg, B
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Gen Internal Med, Burlington, VT USA
关键词
colon; CT; colon neoplasms; computed tomography; image processing; diagnostic radiology; observer performance; images; analysis;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2252011625
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate multiobserver diagnostic performance and reader agreement for colorectal polyp detection in a well-characterized cohort of patients with increased number of polyps, compared with an average-risk patient, with colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 70 patients suspected of having polyps was examined with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colonography, with colonoscopy performed the same day. After air insufflation per rectum, supine and prone images were obtained with single-detector row CT (5-mm collimation, 8-mm table increment, 2-mm reconstruction interval). Images were analyzed independently by four experienced abdominal radiologists using two-dimensional multiplanar reformation followed by selective use of three-dimensional endoscopic volume-rendered images. Data were analyzed both per polyp and per patient. RESULTS: Analysis per polyp demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 for lesions 10 mm or larger (n = 40), with 75% agreement among the four readers. Analysis per patient demonstrated improved detection and agreement, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 for patients with polyps or cancers 10 mm or larger (n = 28), with 94% agreement. When sensitivity and receiver operating characteristic analyses were analyzed per polyp size threshold, results among readers converged and peaked at polyp diameters of approximately 10 mm. CONCLUSION: In this patient cohort, diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement with single-detector row CT colonography was sufficient for detection of patients with lesions 10 mm or larger, with more variable results for smaller polyps. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 390
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Display modes for CT colonography - Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies [J].
Beaulieu, CF ;
Jeffrey, RB ;
Karadi, C ;
Paik, DS ;
Napel, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (01) :203-212
[2]   CT colonography without cathartic preparation: Feasibility study [J].
Callstrom, MR ;
Johnson, CD ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Reed, JE ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Tait, K ;
Wilson, LA ;
Corcoran, KE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :693-698
[3]   CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps [J].
Dachman, AH ;
Kuniyoshi, JK ;
Boyle, CM ;
Samara, Y ;
Hoffmann, KR ;
Rubin, DT ;
Hanan, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) :989-995
[4]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING ANALYSIS - GENERALIZATION TO THE POPULATION OF READERS AND PATIENTS WITH THE JACKKNIFE METHOD [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
METZ, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) :723-731
[5]   A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Schroy, PC ;
Barish, MA ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) :1496-1503
[6]  
FINEBERG HV, 1978, AM J ROENTGENOL, V131, P1
[7]   CT colonography and MR colonography: current status, research directions and comparison [J].
Fletcher, JG ;
Luboldt, W .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05) :786-801
[8]   Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients [J].
Fletcher, JG ;
Johnson, CD ;
Welch, TJ ;
MacCarty, RL ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Reed, JE ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Wilson, LA .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) :704-711
[9]   THE EFFICACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING [J].
FRYBACK, DG ;
THORNBURY, JR .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (02) :88-94
[10]   The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: History, organization, and status [J].
Gohagan, JK ;
Prorok, PC ;
Hayes, RB ;
Kramer, BS .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 21 (06) :251S-272S