The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems

被引:14
作者
Arthington, Angela H. [1 ]
Bunn, Stuart E.
Poff, N. LeRoy
Naiman, Robert J.
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Ctr Rivevine Landscapes, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, eWater Cooperat Res Ctr, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
benchmarking; classification; flow-ecological relationships; flow variability; natural flow regime paradigm; river ecosystem condition;
D O I
10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Accounting for natural differences in flow variability among rivers, and understanding the importance of this for the protection of freshwater biodiversity and maintenance of goods and services that rivers provide; is a great challenge for water managers and scientists. Nevertheless, despite considerable progress in understanding how flow variability sustains river ecosystems, there is a growing temptation to ignore natural system complexity in favor of simplistic, static, environmental flow "rules" to resolve pressing river management issues. We argue that such approaches are misguided and will ultimately contribute to further degradation of river ecosystems. In the absence of detailed empirical information of environmental flow requirements for rivers, we propose a generic approach that incorporates essential aspects of natural flow variability shared across particular classes of rivers that can be validated with empirical biological data and other information in a calibration process. We argue that this approach can bridge the gap between simple hydrological "rules of thumb" and more comprehensive environmental flow assessments and experimental flow restoration projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1311 / 1318
页数:8
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems
    Allan, JD
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2004, 35 : 257 - 284
  • [2] Spatial and temporal variation in fish-assemblage structure in isolated waterholes during the 2001 dry season of an arid-zone floodplain river, Cooper Creek, Australia
    Arthington, AH
    Balcombe, SR
    Wilson, GA
    Thoms, MC
    Marshall, J
    [J]. MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2005, 56 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [3] Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers
    Arthington, AH
    Pusey, BJ
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 19 (5-6) : 377 - 395
  • [4] ARTHINGTON AH, 2004, P 2 INT S MAN LARG R, P37
  • [5] Baron JS, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1247
  • [6] Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function
    Biggs, BJF
    Nikora, VI
    Snelder, TH
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 21 (2-3) : 283 - 298
  • [7] DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive
    Black, AR
    Rowan, JS
    Duck, RW
    Bragg, OM
    Clelland, BE
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 15 (05) : 427 - 446
  • [8] BOVEE KD, 1982, FWS0BS8226 US DEP FI
  • [9] Approaching the physical-biological interface in rivers: a review of methods for ecological evaluation of flow regimes
    Bragg, OM
    Black, AR
    Duck, RW
    Rowan, JS
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 29 (04): : 506 - 531
  • [10] Flow variability in dryland rivers: Boom, bust and the bits in between
    Bunn, SE
    Thoms, MC
    Hamilton, SK
    Capon, SJ
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 22 (02) : 179 - 186