Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories

被引:639
作者
Jones, CJ
Edwards, KJ
Castaglione, S
Winfield, MO
Sala, F
vandeWiel, C
Bredemeijer, G
Vosman, B
Matthes, M
Daly, A
Brettschneider, R
Bettini, P
Buiatti, M
Maestri, E
Malcevschi, A
Marmiroli, N
Aert, R
Volckaert, G
Rueda, J
Linacero, R
Vazquez, A
Karp, A
机构
[1] UNIV BRISTOL, IACR, LONG ASHTON RES STN, DEPT AGR SCI, BRISTOL BS18 9AF, AVON, ENGLAND
[2] UNIV MILAN, DIPARTIMENTO BIOL, I-20133 MILAN, ITALY
[3] DLO, CPRO, NL-6700 AA WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS
[4] ZENECA SEEDS, JEALOTTS HILL RES STN, BRACKNELL RG12 6EY, BERKS, ENGLAND
[5] INST ALLGEMEINE BOT, D-22609 HAMBURG, GERMANY
[6] UNIV FLORENCE, DIPARTIMENTO BIOL ANIM & GENET, I-50125 FLORENCE, ITALY
[7] UNIV PARMA, DIPARTIMENTO SCI AMBIENTALI, I-43100 PARMA, ITALY
[8] CATHOLIC UNIV LEUVEN, LAB GENE TECHNOL, B-3001 LOUVAIN, BELGIUM
[9] UNIV COMPLUTENSE MADRID, FAC BIOL, DEPT GENET, E-28040 MADRID, SPAIN
关键词
DNA markers; RAPD; AFLP; SSR; microsatellite; network; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009612517139
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A number of PCR-based techniques can be used to detect polymorphisms in plants. For their wide-scale usage in germplasm characterisation and breeding it is important that these marker technologies can be exchanged between laboratories, which in turn requires that they can be standardised to yield reproducible results, so that direct collation and comparison of the data are possible. This article describes a network experiment involving several European laboratories, in which the reproducibility of three popular molecular marker techniques was examined: random-amplified fragment length polymorphism (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and sequence-tagged microsatellites (SSR). For each technique, an optimal system was chosen, which had been standardised and routinely used by one laboratory. This system (genetic screening package) was distributed to different participating laboratories in the network and the results obtained compared with those of the original sender. Different experiences were gained in this exchange experiment with the different techniques. RAPDs proved difficult to reproduce. For AFLPs, a single-band difference was observed in one track, whilst SSR alleles were amplified by all laboratories, but small differences in their sizing were obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 390
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   COMBINED MAPPING OF AFLP AND RFLP MARKERS IN BARLEY [J].
BECKER, J ;
VOS, P ;
KUIPER, M ;
SALAMINI, F ;
HEUN, M .
MOLECULAR & GENERAL GENETICS, 1995, 249 (01) :65-73
[2]   Isolation and characterization of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera L) [J].
Bowers, JE ;
Dangl, GS ;
Vignani, R ;
Meredith, CP .
GENOME, 1996, 39 (04) :628-633
[3]  
BUSCHER N, 1993, VITIS, V32, P187
[4]   RAPD FINGERPRINTS FOR IDENTIFICATION AND FOR TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF ELITE POPLAR (POPULUS SPP) CLONES [J].
CASTIGLIONE, S ;
WANG, G ;
DAMIANI, G ;
BANDI, C ;
BISOFFI, S ;
SALA, F .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1993, 87 (1-2) :54-59
[5]   THE USE OF RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA MARKERS IN WHEAT [J].
DEVOS, KM ;
GALE, MD .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1992, 84 (5-6) :567-572
[6]   EFFECTS OF THERMOCYCLERS AND PRIMERS ON THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BANDING-PATTERNS IN RANDOMLY AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA ANALYSIS [J].
HE, QS ;
VILJANEN, MK ;
MERTSOLA, J .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1994, 8 (02) :155-160
[7]   High-resolution genotypic analysis of the genus Aeromonas by AFLP fingerprinting [J].
Huys, G ;
Coopman, R ;
Janssen, P ;
Kersters, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1996, 46 (02) :572-580
[8]   Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy [J].
Janssen, P ;
Coopman, R ;
Huys, G ;
Swings, J ;
Bleeker, M ;
Vos, P ;
Zabeau, M ;
Kersters, K .
MICROBIOLOGY-UK, 1996, 142 :1881-1893
[9]  
Koreth J, 1996, J PATHOL, V178, P239, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199603)178:3<239::AID-PATH506>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-5