Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy

被引:134
作者
Pidgeon, Nick [1 ,2 ]
Demski, Christina [1 ,2 ]
Butler, Catherine [3 ]
Parkhill, Karen [4 ]
Spence, Alexa [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Tyndall Ctr, Understanding Risk Res Grp, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Climate Change Consortium Wales, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Exeter, Dept Geog, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England
[4] Bangor Univ, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
[5] Univ Nottingham, Horizon Digital Econ Res, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
public engagement; national dialogue; energy system transitions; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; RISK COMMUNICATION; UNCERTAIN CLIMATE; TECHNOLOGIES; PORTFOLIOS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1317512111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper examines some of the science communication challenges involved when designing and conducting public deliberation processes on issues of national importance. We take as our illustrative case study a recent research project investigating public values and attitudes toward future energy system change for the United Kingdom. National-level issues such as this are often particularly difficult to engage the public with because of their inherent complexity, derived from multiple interconnected elements and policy frames, extended scales of analysis, and different manifestations of uncertainty. With reference to the energy system project, we discuss ways of meeting a series of science communication challenges arising when engaging the public with national topics, including the need to articulate systems thinking and problem scale, to provide balanced information and policy framings in ways that open up spaces for reflection and deliberation, and the need for varied methods of facilitation and data synthesis that permit access to participants' broader values. Although resource intensive, national-level deliberation is possible and can produce useful insights both for participants and for science policy.
引用
收藏
页码:13606 / 13613
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC ATTITUDES ENG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SAGE HDB MIXED METHO, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781506335193
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society
[4]  
[Anonymous], SUMMARY FINDINGS SUR
[5]   Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites [J].
Arvai, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (08) :1469-1476
[6]   Exploring a structured decision approach as a means of fostering participatory space policy making at NASA [J].
Arvai, JL ;
McDaniels, T ;
Gregory, R .
SPACE POLICY, 2002, 18 (03) :221-231
[7]  
Arvai J, 2012, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, V28, P43
[8]   Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste [J].
Bickerstaff, K. ;
Lorenzoni, I. ;
Pidgeon, N. F. ;
Poortinga, W. ;
Simmons, P. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (02) :145-169
[9]  
Bierle T.C., 2002, DEMOCRACY PRACTICE P
[10]  
Brown J., 2005, The world cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter, V1st