Retrograde Acucise® endopyelotomy:: Long-term results -: Reply by author

被引:29
作者
Lechevallier, E
机构
[1] Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Salvator, Univ. de la Mediter., Marseille
[2] Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Salvator, 13274 Marseille, 249, Bvd Ste Marguerite
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.1999.13.575
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the long-term outcome of retrograde endopyelotomy with the Acucise cutting balloon as a first-line treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in 36 patients (median age 44 years). Patients: Twenty-three patients had a primary UPJO. The median follow-up in the series was 24 (6-42) months. Results: Success, defined as a subjective and objective improvement, was obtained in 27 (75%). In multivariate analysis, only the presence of a crossing vessel (45% v 81%) was a significant covariate for success. The success rates for primary and secondary UPJO were 74% and 77% respectively. The grade of obstruction had no impact on results. The median time to the nine failures was 3 months, and no failure occurred more than 6 months after the endopyelotomy. In 75% of the failures with no crossing vessel, redo retrograde Acucise endopyelotomy was successful. Conclusion: Retrograde Acucise endopyelotomy is an efficient long-term treatment of UPJO with low morbidity. This technique is a reasonable choice for first-line treatment of UPJO.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 580
页数:2
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF OPEN AND ENDOUROLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE OBSTRUCTED URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION [J].
BROOKS, JD ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
PREMINGER, GM ;
SCHUESSLER, WW ;
MOORE, RG .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (06) :791-795
[2]   ENDOPYELOTOMY AND ENDOURETEROTOMY WITH THE ACUCISE URETERAL CUTTING BALLOON DEVICE - PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE [J].
CHANDHOKE, PS ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
STONE, AM ;
MCDOUGALL, EM ;
BUELNA, T ;
HILAL, N ;
CHANG, M ;
STEGWELL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1993, 7 (01) :45-51
[3]  
Clayman RV, 1998, J UROLOGY, V160, P692
[4]   Long-term follow-up of acucise incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral strictures [J].
Cohen, TD ;
Gross, MB ;
Preminger, GM .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) :317-323
[5]  
Danuser H, 1998, J UROLOGY, V159, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64011-4
[6]   Retrograde treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction using the ureteral cutting balloon catheter [J].
Faerber, GJ ;
Richardson, TD ;
Farah, N ;
Ohl, DA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :454-458
[7]  
Gelet A, 1997, EUR UROL, V31, P389
[8]  
Goldfischer ER, 1998, UROLOGY, V51, P855
[9]   Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy [J].
Hoenig, DM ;
Shalhav, AL ;
Elbahnasy, AM ;
McDougall, EM ;
Smith, D ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) :131-133
[10]   Acucise endopyelotomy: Assessment of long-term durability - Reply [J].
Nadler, RB ;
Rao, GS ;
Pearle, MS ;
Nakada, SY ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) :1098-1098