Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges

被引:285
作者
Leonard, GD [1 ]
Swain, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Canc Therapeut Branch, Canc Res Ctr, OHHS,Natl Naval Med Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2004年 / 96卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djh164
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a noninvasive form of breast cancer, has increased markedly in recent decades, and DCIS now accounts for approximately 20% of breast cancers diagnosed by mammography. Laboratory and patient data suggest that DCIS is a precursor lesion for invasive cancer. The appropriate classification of DCIS has provoked much debate; a number of classification systems have been developed, but there is a lack of uniformity in the diagnosis and prognostication of this disease. Further investigation of molecular markers should improve the classification of DCIS and our understanding of its relationship to invasive disease. Controversy also exists with regard to the optimal management of DCIS patients. In the past, mastectomy was the primary treatment for patients with DCIS, but as with invasive cancer, breast-conserving surgery has become the standard approach. Three randomized trials have reported a statistically significant decrease in the risk of recurrence with radiation therapy in combination with lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy alone, but there was no survival advantage with the addition of radiotherapy. Two randomized trials have suggested an additional benefit, in terms of recurrence, with the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, although in one trial the benefit was not statistically significant. Current data suggest that tamoxifen use should be restricted to patients with estrogen receptor-positive DCIS. Neither trial demonstrated a survival benefit with adjuvant tamoxifen. Ongoing and recently completed studies should provide information on outcomes in patients treated with lumpectomy alone and on the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to tamoxifen. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:906-20]
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 920
页数:15
相关论文
共 263 条
[1]  
AKHTAR S, 1998, P ASCO, V17, pA120
[2]   Biophenotypes of breast carcinoma in situ defined by image analysis of biological parameters [J].
Albonico, G ;
Querzoli, P ;
Ferretti, S ;
Magri, E ;
Nenci, I .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1996, 192 (02) :117-123
[3]   THE EDINBURGH RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF BREAST-CANCER SCREENING - RESULTS AFTER 10 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP [J].
ALEXANDER, FE ;
ANDERSON, TJ ;
BROWN, HK ;
FORREST, APM ;
HEPBURN, W ;
KIRKPATRICK, AE ;
MCDONALD, C ;
MUIR, BB ;
PRESCOTT, RJ ;
SHEPHERD, SM ;
SMITH, A ;
WARNER, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (03) :542-548
[4]  
Alle KM, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P847
[5]  
Allred DC, 2002, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V76, pS36
[6]   THE PREVALENCE OF CARCINOMA INSITU IN NORMAL AND CANCER-ASSOCIATED BREASTS [J].
ALPERS, CE ;
WELLINGS, SR .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1985, 16 (08) :796-807
[7]  
American Joint Committee on Cancer, 2002, CANC STAG MAN, P223
[8]   Ten-year results of treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast with conservative surgery and radiotherapy [J].
Amichetti, M ;
Caffo, O ;
Richetti, A ;
Zini, G ;
Rigon, A ;
Antonello, M ;
Arcicasa, M ;
Coghetto, F ;
Valdagni, R ;
Maluta, S ;
DiMarco, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (10) :1559-1565
[9]   MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING AND MORTALITY FROM BREAST-CANCER - THE MALMO MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING TRIAL [J].
ANDERSSON, I ;
ASPERGREN, K ;
JANZON, L ;
LANDBERG, T ;
LINDHOLM, K ;
LINELL, F ;
LJUNGBERG, O ;
RANSTAM, J ;
SIGFUSSON, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6654) :943-948
[10]  
ASHIKARI R, 1971, CANCER, V28, P1182, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(1971)28:5<1182::AID-CNCR2820280515>3.0.CO