Test-Retest Variability of Microperimetry Using the Nidek MP1 in Patients with Macular Disease

被引:122
作者
Chen, Fred K. [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Praveen J. [1 ]
Xing, Wen [1 ]
Bunce, Catey [1 ]
Egan, Catherine [1 ]
Tufail, Adnan T. [1 ]
Coffey, Peter J. [2 ]
Rubin, Gary S. [2 ,3 ]
Da Cruz, Lyndon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Moorfields Eye Hosp, London EC1V 2PD, England
[2] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[3] NIHR Biomed Res Ctr Ophthalmol, London, England
关键词
SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RETINAL-PIGMENT EPITHELIUM; GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL-FIELDS; WHITE DOT SYNDROME; AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION; INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; ACUITY MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.08-2926
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To determine the test-retest variability of the retinal sensitivity of the Nidek MP1 microperimeter in patients with macular disease. METHODS. In this prospective study, 50 patients were enrolled with a range of macular diseases. One examiner performed two consecutive microperimetry tests for all patients using the same test strategy. Test-retest variability for mean sensitivity (MS), mean deviation (MD), point-wise sensitivity (PWS), local defect classification (LDC), average sensitivity for the central macula (CMS, 16 loci inside 10), paracentral macular sensitivity (PMS, 52 loci in the 10 to 20 ring), and dense scotoma size (DSS) were analyzed by calculating the 95% coefficients of repeatability or percentage agreement. RESULTS. Mean (SD) age and visual acuity were 61 (15) years and 0.34 (0.32) logMAR, respectively. The mean difference in MS between tests 1 and 2 was +0.2 dB (SD, 0.9 dB; P = 0.127). The coefficients of repeatability for MS, MD, CMS, and PMS were 1.81, 2.56, 2.13, and 1.93 dB, respectively. The mean (SD) of coefficients of repeatability for PWS across all 68 loci was 5.56 (0.86) dB. Of all test loci in all patients 76% had perfect agreement in LDC, and 94% of patients had a change in DSS of four or fewer test loci. CONCLUSIONS. Test-retest variability was lowest for MS and highest for PWS. However, MS does not provide spatial information. The authors recommend the use of CMS and PMS for monitoring macular function and consider a change of greater than 2.56 and 2.31 dB (the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of their coefficients of repeatability), respectively, to exceed test-retest variability. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 3464-3472) DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2926
引用
收藏
页码:3464 / 3472
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Perimetry and the Fundus: An Introduction to Microperimetry
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIOMETRICS
[3]  
Artes PH, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P2654
[4]  
ASMAN P, 1992, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V70, P679
[5]  
ASMAN P, 1992, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V70, P671
[6]   INVESTIGATION OF CENTRAL VISUAL-FIELDS IN PATIENTS WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR CHANGES [J].
ATCHISON, DA ;
LOVIEKITCHIN, JE ;
SWANN, PG .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1990, 67 (03) :179-183
[7]   Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis [J].
Bainbridge, James W. B. ;
Smith, Alexander J. ;
Barker, Susie S. ;
Robbie, Scott ;
Henderson, Robert ;
Balaggan, Kamaljit ;
Viswanathan, Ananth ;
Holder, Graham E. ;
Stockman, Andrew ;
Tyler, Nick ;
Petersen-Jones, Simon ;
Bhattacharya, Shomi S. ;
Thrasher, Adrian J. ;
Fitzke, Fred W. ;
Carter, Barrie J. ;
Rubin, Gary S. ;
Moore, Anthony T. ;
Ali, Robin R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (21) :2231-2239
[8]   Visual acuity as an outcome measure in clinical trials of retinal diseases [J].
Beck, Roy W. ;
Maguire, Maureen G. ;
Bressler, Neil M. ;
Glassman, Adam R. ;
Lindblad, Anne S. ;
Ferris, Frederick L. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (10) :1804-1809
[9]   Test-retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma [J].
Bjerre, A ;
Grigg, JR ;
Parry, NRA ;
Henson, DB .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (11) :4035-4040
[10]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310