Role of volume overload in dialysis-refractory hypertension

被引:105
作者
Fishbane, S
Natke, E
Maesaka, JK
机构
[1] WINTHROP UNIV HOSP,MINEOLA,NY 11501
[2] SUNY STONY BROOK,SCH MED,DEPT MED,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0272-6386(96)90309-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It has been observed that while most hypertensive hemodialysis patients normalize their blood pressure with volume removal, there is a population of hemodialysis patients whose hypertension is refractory to volume removal. Our hypothesis is that such patients are still volume overloaded posthemodialysis and are not at a ''true'' dry weight. This study used atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) assays (as a marker of hydration status) to study this hypothesis. Three groups of patients were studied: normotensive hemodialysis patients (n = 12; group 1), hypertensive hemodialysis patients who consistently normalize their blood pressure with fluid removal in = 12; group 2), and hypertensive hemodialysis patients whose hypertension is refractory to fluid removal (n = 9; group 3). Plasma ANP levels were measured before and after hemodialysis by radioimmunoassay after extraction on Sep-Pac (Penninsula Laboratories, Belmont). On the day of study the predialysis mean arterial pressures in the three groups were 94.9 +/- 1.9 mm Hg in the normotensive group, 119.5 +/- 2.7 mm Hg in the dialysis-sensitive hypertension group, and 134.4 +/- 3.8 mm Hg in the dialysis-refractory hypertension group (P < 0.05 for comparisons between all groups). Mean arterial pressure did not change predialysis and postdialysis in the normotensive group (94.9 +/- 1.9 mm Hg to 93.1 +/- 1.8 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.24), decreased in the dialysis-sensitive hypertension group (119.5 +/- 2.7 mm Hg to 100.8 +/- 3.7 mm Hg, respectively; P < 0.0001), and did not change in the dialysis-refractory hypertension group (134.4 +/- 3.8 mm Hg to 133.8 +/- 2.9 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.77). Predialysis and postdialysis serum ANP levels were, respectively, 235.8 +/- 27.7 pg/mL and 237.8 +/- 36.2 pg/mL (P = 0.92) in the normotensive group, 809.2 +/- 295.5 pg/mL and 161.1 +/- 48.6 pg/mL (P = 0.03) in the dialysis-sensitive hypertension group, and 1,728.3 +/- 309.9 pg/mL and 1,936.1 +/- 359.1 pg/mL (P = 0.22) in the dialysis-refractory hypertension group. Mean predialysis ANP levels were higher in the dialysis-refractory hypertension group than in the dialysis-sensitive hypertension group (1,728.3 +/- 309.9 pg/mL v 809 +/- 359.1 pg/mL; P = 0.048). Mean prehemodialysis ANP in all hypertensive patients (n = 21) was higher (1,203.1 +/- 232.9) than in the normotensive patients (235.8 +/- 27.7) (P = 0.004). In conclusion, our findings are consistent with a hypothesis that inadequate removal of excess volumeduring hemodialysis plays a major role in dialysis-refractory hypertension. (C) 1996 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 261
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   SURVIVAL AS AN INDEX OF ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS [J].
CHARRA, B ;
CALEMARD, E ;
RUFFET, M ;
CHAZOT, C ;
TERRAT, JC ;
VANEL, T ;
LAURENT, G .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 41 (05) :1286-1291
[2]   HYPERTENSION IS NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
CHEIGH, JS ;
MILITE, C ;
SULLIVAN, JF ;
RUBIN, AL ;
STENZEL, KH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1992, 19 (05) :453-459
[3]  
GOLDBERG AP, 1982, J CARDIOVASC PHARM, V4, pS257
[4]   RESPONSE OF VASOACTIVE SUBSTANCES TO INTERMITTENT ULTRAFILTRATION IN NORMOTENSIVE HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
HEINTZ, B ;
KONIGS, F ;
DAKSHINAMURTY, KV ;
KIERDORF, H ;
GLADZIWA, U ;
KIRSTEN, R ;
NELSON, K ;
WIELAND, D ;
RIEHL, J ;
MANN, H ;
SIEBERTH, HG .
NEPHRON, 1993, 65 (02) :266-272
[5]  
KOHSE KP, 1993, CLIN NEPHROL, V40, P83
[6]  
KORNERUP JH, 1984, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V41, P123
[7]  
KOUW PM, 1993, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V4, P98
[8]  
NARUSE M, 1994, HYPERTENSION S1, V23, P231
[9]  
*NIH NAT I DIAB DI, 1993, US REN DAT SYST USRD
[10]   HIGH PLASMA ATRIAL-NATRIURETIC-PEPTIDE INDEPENDENT OF SODIUM-BALANCE IN SIADH [J].
SAKAMOTO, H ;
INOUE, K ;
MARUMO, F .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 256 (10) :1293-1294