On the question of an identity status category order: Rasch model step and scale statistics used to identify category order

被引:12
作者
Al-Owidha, Amjed [2 ]
Green, Kathy E. [1 ]
Kroger, Jane [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Morgridge Coll Educ, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Tromso, N-9001 Tromso, Norway
关键词
adolescents; ego development; identity status; psychometric; Rasch; scale; EGO DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0165025408100110
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040206 [发展心理学];
摘要
The question of whether or not a developmental continuum underlies James Marcia's identity statuses has been a topic of debate among identity researchers for nearly 20 years. This study addressed the prefatory question of whether the identity statuses can be empirically ordered in a theoretically optimal way. This question was addressed via use of Rasch model threshold and scale statistics, which effectively differentiated empirically optimal from suboptimal category orders. All permutations of Marcia's 4 identity statuses were generated in relation to stages from Loevinger's model of ego development and Kegan's model of self-other differentiation. The optimal identity status order found was diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, to achievement in 2 sets of analyses, and diffusion combined with fore closure to moratorium, to achievement in 2 additional sets of analyses. The order diffusion, foreclosure, achievement, to moratorium performed nearly as well in one set of analyses. Results, in general, support the theoretically optimal category order. Rasch model threshold and scale statistics can be effectively applied to place categories into an empirically optimal order or to assess the match between theoretical and empirical category orders.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 96
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SOC RES AD M BALT MD
[2]
[Anonymous], GUIDE SUBJECT UNPUB
[3]
[Anonymous], 2007, APPL RASCH MODEL
[4]
[Anonymous], 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[5]
COTE JE, 1988, DEV REV, V8, P147
[6]
Erikson E.H., 1968, Identity: Youth and Crisis
[7]
Hy L.X., 1996, Measuring Ego Development, VSecond
[8]
Kegan R., 1982, The evolving self, problem and process in human development
[9]
Kegan R., 1994, OUR HEADS
[10]
Why Is Identity Achievement So Elusive? [J].
Kroger, Jane .
IDENTITY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORY AND RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (04) :331-348