Effectiveness and acceptability of a domiciliary multidrug inhalation treatment in elderly patients with chronic airflow obstruction: Metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer

被引:12
作者
Balzano, G [1 ]
Battiloro, R [1 ]
Biraghi, M [1 ]
Stefanelli, F [1 ]
Fuschillo, S [1 ]
Gaudiosi, C [1 ]
De Angelis, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Salvatore Maugeri Fdn, Div Pneumol, Rehabil Inst Telese Terme, I-82037 Telese Terme, BN, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG | 2000年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
aerosol therapy; MDI; jet nebulizer; COPD; asthma; airflow obstruction; reversibility of airway obstruction;
D O I
10.1089/jam.2000.13.25
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term bronchodilator effect as well as the patient acceptability of a 2-week, multidrug, inhalation treatment delivered by a metered dose inhaler (MDI) versus a jet nebulizer in a group of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma and an at least partially reversible airflow obstruction. Twenty elderly outpatients (17 men; mean +/- SD age, 67 +/- 2 years; mean +/- SD baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 46.5 +/- 14% of predicted value) with COPD or asthma participated in the study, which was of an open, randomized, crossover design. After a 1-day baseline evaluation, including patient history, clinical examination, and spirometry, participants were randomly assigned to receive a multidrug inhalation treatment (a combination of salbutamol, ipratropium, and flunisolide) with either an MDI or a jet nebulizer. Two weeks later, they were shifted to treatment with the alternative system for a further 2 weeks. FEV1 was measured on the first and fourteenth days of each treatment period, on each occasion both before and 30 minutes after the morning inhalation. At the end of the study, patients were asked to express a personal preference for one of the two inhalation treatments with regard to effectiveness and acceptability by filling out a simple questionnaire. Both the MDI and jet nebulizer had a significant immediate bronchodilator effect on the first and fourteenth days of treatment, with no differences between treatments. No long-term bronchodilator effect was seen with either aerosol delivery system. Patient preferences were clearly in favor of the jet nebulizer with regard to effectiveness and in favor of the MDI with regard to acceptability. In conclusion, in elderly patients with COPD or asthma and partially reversible airflow obstruction, a maintenance multidrug bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory inhalation treatment produced a statistically significant and clinically relevant bronchodilator effect without substantial differences between the two delivery systems. Most patients considered the MDI to be more acceptable and the jet nebulizer to be more effective. These preferences should be taken into consideration when prescribing a maintenance aerosol inhalation treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
*AM THOR SOC, 1987, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V13, P1285
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V136, P225
[3]   AN OPEN, PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF BETA(2) AGONISTS GIVEN VIA NEBULIZER, NEBUHALER, OR PRESSURIZED INHALER BY AMBULANCE CREW AS EMERGENCY TREATMENT [J].
CAMPBELL, IA ;
COLMAN, SB ;
MAO, JH ;
PRESCOTT, RJ ;
WESTON, CFM .
THORAX, 1995, 50 (01) :79-80
[4]  
CELLI BR, 1995, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V152, pS77
[5]   SALBUTAMOL INHALATION IN CHRONIC ASTHMA BRONCHIALE - DOSE AEROSOL VS JET NEBULIZER [J].
CHRISTENSSON, P ;
ARBORELIUS, M ;
LILJA, B .
CHEST, 1981, 79 (04) :416-419
[6]   Home nebulized therapy for patients with COPD - Patient compliance with treatment and its relation to quality of life [J].
Corden, ZM ;
Bosley, CM ;
Rees, PJ ;
McLellanCochrane, G .
CHEST, 1997, 112 (05) :1278-1282
[7]  
CROMPTON GK, 1982, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V63, P101
[8]  
CROMPTON GK, 1982, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V63, P96
[9]   COMPARISON OF 3 TECHNIQUES OF INHALATION ON THE AIRWAY RESPONSE TO TERBUTALINE [J].
CUSHLEY, MJ ;
LEWIS, RA ;
TATTERSFIELD, AE .
THORAX, 1983, 38 (12) :908-913
[10]   USE AND MISUSE OF METERED-DOSE INHALERS BY PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE - A CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 INSTRUCTION METHODS [J].
DEBLAQUIERE, P ;
CHRISTENSEN, DB ;
CARTER, WB ;
MARTIN, TR .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1989, 140 (04) :910-916