Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region

被引:14
作者
Kells, Bradley J. [1 ,3 ]
Swinton, Scott M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dep Econ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dep Agr Food & Resource Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Res Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
LAND-USE; CROPS; BIOFUELS; BIOENERGY; ETHANOL; ENERGY; EMISSIONS; WILLOW; COVER;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2013.0397
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Producing bioenergy feedstocks on non-crop land can largely avoid the food price feedbacks of energy biomass production on cropland. The U.S. northern tier grassland-to-forest ecotone offers large areas of marginal land that is not currently cropped. In this ecological transition zone, the relative profitability of grassy vs. woody sources of energy biomass is little studied. This paper reports an exploratory investment analysis of cellulosic biomass production in the northern Great Lakes region. It compares two short-rotation tree crops, willow (Salix sachalinensis F. Schmidt) and hybrid poplar (Populus nigra L. X P. maximowiczii A. Henry), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) (a native prairie grass) to conventional mixed hay. Because biomass markets are not yet well developed, this study calculates threshold prices and yields at which biomass crops become at least as profitable as mixed grass hay. At 2010-2012 prices and available production technologies, none of the cellulosic crops is competitive with the hay baseline system. The breakeven price of energy biomass ranges from $90-100 per oven-dry Mg-1 for all three energy crops. Breakeven yields are much more variable, due to the high cost of harvesting woody biomass. At 2010-2012 prices, necessary biomass yield increases range from 3.5-fold for switchgrass and willow to over 25-fold for poplar. While the ratio of input costs to revenue remains relatively constant between the northern and southern Great Lakes regions, the opportunity cost of active cropland in the southern zone is much higher, implying an economic comparative advantage for marginal land of the northern tier of the Great Lakes region.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 406
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abrahamson L.P., 2008, DEV WILLOW BIOMASS C
[2]  
Abrahamson L.P., 2010, Shrub Willow Biomass Producers Handbook
[3]   Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems [J].
Adler, Paul R. ;
Del Grosso, Stephen J. ;
Parton, William J. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (03) :675-691
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual
[5]  
Baier S. L., 2009, 967 BOARD GOV FED RE
[6]  
Boehlje MichaelD., 1984, FARM MANAGEMENT
[7]   The Economics of Biomass Collection and Transportation and Its Supply to Indiana Cellulosic and Electric Utility Facilities [J].
Brechbill, Sarah C. ;
Tyner, Wallace E. ;
Ileleji, Klein E. .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (02) :141-152
[8]   The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands [J].
Campbell, J. Elliott ;
Lobell, David B. ;
Genova, Robert C. ;
Field, Christopher B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (15) :5791-5794
[9]  
Chen X., 2012, AGBIOFORUM, V15, P1
[10]   Geographical patterns in openland cover and hayfield mowing in the Upper Great Lakes region: implications for grassland bird conservation [J].
Corace, R. Gregory, III ;
Flaspohler, David J. ;
Shartell, Lindsey M. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2009, 24 (03) :309-323