Structural change and post-socialist stratification: Labor market transitions in contemporary Russia

被引:70
作者
Gerber, TP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Sociol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3088910
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In Russia, market transition has led to sweeping structural changes: a long recession, growth of the private sector expansion of certain branches of the economy and contraction of others, a decrease in average firm size, and regional differentiation in economic performance. These structural changes had important consequences for stratification through their effects on individual labor market outcomes. Analyses of nine types of individual labor market transitions in Russia using 1991-1997 work-history data show that structural location has strong effects. Human capital and membership in the Communist Party of the Soviet Union also influence labor market prospects, but not in ways consistent with general theories about how market transition affects stratification processes. Structural change plays a key role in determining the impact of market reforms on stratification. But market transition produces variable patterns of structural change in different countries and in different regions within a single country. The structural perspective demonstrates why market transition has variable consequences for stratification: Different prior conditions and reform policies produce different patterns of structural change.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 659
页数:31
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Aslund A., 1995, How Russia Became a Market Economy
[2]   Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China [J].
Bian, YJ ;
Logan, JR .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 61 (05) :739-758
[3]  
Blasi Joseph, 1997, Kremlin Capitalism: Privatizing the Russian Economy
[4]  
Boycko M., 1995, PRIVATIZING RUSSIA
[5]  
Brainerd E, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P1094
[6]   The state and economic involution: Russia through a China lens [J].
Burawoy, M .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 24 (06) :1105-1117
[7]   Comment: Controversies and evidence in the market transition debate [J].
Cao, Y ;
Nee, VG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 105 (04) :1175-1189
[8]   JOB-SHIFT PATTERNS IN THE FEDERAL-REPUBLIC-OF-GERMANY - THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL-CLASS, INDUSTRIAL SECTOR, AND ORGANIZATIONAL SIZE [J].
CARROLL, GR ;
MAYER, KU .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1986, 51 (03) :323-341
[9]   Internal mobility and labour market flexibility in Russia [J].
Clarke, S ;
Donova, I .
EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES, 1999, 51 (02) :213-243
[10]  
CLARKE S, 1998, STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMEN, P9