The Influence of the Phonological Neighborhood Clustering Coefficient on Spoken Word Recognition

被引:93
作者
Chan, Kit Ying [1 ]
Vitevitch, Michael S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Psychol, Spoken Language Lab, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
spoken word recognition; network science; clustering coefficient; small-world network; neighborhood density; FIXED-EFFECT FALLACY; PHONOTACTIC PROBABILITY; SIMILARITY NEIGHBORHOODS; TRACE MODEL; NETWORKS; LANGUAGE; ACTIVATION; FREQUENCY; SHORTLIST; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1037/a0016902
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Clustering coefficient-a measure derived from the new science of networks-refers to the proportion of phonological neighbors of a target word that are also neighbors of each other. Consider the words bat, hat, and can, all of which are neighbors of the word cat; the words bat and hat are also neighbors of each other. In a perceptual identification task, words with a low clustering coefficient (i.e., few neighbors are neighbors of each other) were more accurately identified than words with a high clustering coefficient (i.e., many neighbors are neighbors of each other). In a lexical decision task, words with a low clustering coefficient were responded to more quickly than words with a high clustering coefficient. These findings suggest that the structure of the lexicon (i.e., the similarity relationships among neighbors of the target word measured by clustering coefficient) influences lexical access in spoken word recognition. Simulations of the TRACE and Shortlist models of spoken word recognition failed to account for the present findings. A framework for a new model of spoken word recognition is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:1934 / 1949
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Statistical mechanics of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Barabási, AL .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) :47-97
[2]  
ARBESMAN S, INT J BIFUR IN PRESS
[3]  
Baayen R.H., 2004, Mental Lexicon Working Papers, V1, P1
[4]   The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon [J].
Baayen, RH ;
Tweedie, FJ ;
Schreuder, R .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 81 (1-3) :55-65
[5]  
Batagelj V., 1998, Connections, V21, P47
[6]   The small world of human language [J].
Cancho, RFI ;
Solé, RV .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1482) :2261-2265
[7]   ON WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECT [J].
CATLIN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1969, 76 (05) :504-&
[8]   LANGUAGE AS FIXED-EFFECT FALLACY - CRITIQUE OF LANGUAGE STATISTICS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH [J].
CLARK, HH .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1973, 12 (04) :335-359
[9]   SIMILARITY NEIGHBORHOODS OF SPOKEN 2-SYLLABLE WORDS - RETROACTIVE EFFECTS ON MULTIPLE ACTIVATION [J].
CLUFF, MS ;
LUCE, PA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (03) :551-563
[10]   PSYSCOPE - AN INTERACTIVE GRAPHIC SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING AND CONTROLLING EXPERIMENTS IN THE PSYCHOLOGY LABORATORY USING MACINTOSH COMPUTERS [J].
COHEN, J ;
MACWHINNEY, B ;
FLATT, M ;
PROVOST, J .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1993, 25 (02) :257-271