Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction

被引:81
作者
Tian, Lu [1 ]
Cai, Tianxi [2 ]
Pfeffer, Marc A. [3 ]
Piankov, Nikita [4 ]
Cremieux, Pierre-Yves [4 ,5 ]
Wei, L. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Anal Grp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Univ Quebec, Dept Econ, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Continuity correction for zero events; Exact inference procedure; Odds ratio; Risk difference; COMBINING DEPENDENT TESTS; SPARSE DATA;
D O I
10.1093/biostatistics/kxn034
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recently, meta-analysis has been widely utilized to combine information across comparative clinical studies for evaluating drug efficacy or safety profile. When dealing with rather rare events, a substantial proportion of studies may not have any events of interest. Conventional methods either exclude such studies or add an arbitrary positive value to each cell of the corresponding 2x2 tables in the analysis. In this article, we present a simple, effective procedure to make valid inferences about the parameter of interest with all available data without artificial continuity corrections. We then use the procedure to analyze the data from 48 comparative trials involving rosiglitazone with respect to its possible cardiovascular toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events [J].
Bradburn, Michael J. ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Localio, A. Russell .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) :53-77
[2]   Interval estimation for a binomial proportion - Comment - Rejoinder [J].
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A ;
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA ;
Casella, G ;
Corcoran, C ;
Mehta, C ;
Ghosh, M ;
Santner, TJ ;
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 16 (02) :101-133
[3]   Test-based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions [J].
Chan, ISF ;
Zhang, ZX .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) :1202-1209
[4]   Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Phillips, AN .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7121) :1533-1537
[5]   Meta-analysis - Potentials and promise [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7119) :1371-1374
[6]  
Hwang JTG, 2001, STAT SINICA, V11, P807
[7]  
Nissen SE, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V357, P100
[8]   An assessment of the use of the continuity correction for sparse data in meta-analysis [J].
Sankey, SS ;
Weissfeld, LA ;
Fine, MJ ;
Kapoor, W .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 1996, 25 (04) :1031-1056
[9]   Combining information from independent sources through confidence distributions [J].
Singh, K ;
Xie, M ;
Strawderman, WE .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2005, 33 (01) :159-183
[10]   What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data [J].
Sweeting, MJ ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Lambert, PC .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (09) :1351-1375