Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

被引：761

作者：

Wenneras, C ^{[1
]}

Wold, A ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV GOTHENBURG, DEPT CLIN IMMUNOL, S-41346 GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN

来源：

NATURE | 1997年 / 387卷 / 6631期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1038/387341a0

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores for postdoctoral fellowship applications, the system is revealed as being riddled with prejudice. The policy of secrecy in evaluation must be abandoned.

引用

页码：341 / 343

页数：3

共 14 条

[1] ITALIAN PROFESSORSHIPS [J].

CALZA, L ;

GARBISA, S .

NATURE, 1995, 374 (6522) :492-492

[2] CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW [J].

COLE, S ;

COLE, JR ;

SIMON, GA .

SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4523) :881-886

[3] REVIEWER BIAS [J].

ERNST, E ;

RESCH, KL ;

UHER, EM .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 116 (11) :958-958

[4] ON GIRAFFES AND PEER-REVIEW [J].

FORSDYKE, DR .

FASEB JOURNAL, 1993, 7 (08) :619-621

[5]

Frieze I.H., 1975, WOMEN ACHIEVEMENT SO, P158

[6] INAPPROPRIATE AND APPROPRIATE SELECTION OF PEERS IN GRANT REVIEW [J].

GLANTZ, SA ;

BERO, LA .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02) :114-116

[7]

GOLDBERG P, 1968, TRANS-ACT-SOC SCI MO, V5, P28

[8] MEASURES OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY [J].

LONG, JS .

SOCIAL FORCES, 1992, 71 (01) :159-178

[9]

NIEVA VF, 1980, ACAD MANAGE REV, V5, P267, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1980.4288749

[10]

OLEARY VE, 1982, REV PERSONALITY SOCI, V2, P9

← 1 2 →