Systematic review: Computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents

被引:232
作者
Terasawa, T
Blackmore, CC
Bent, S
Kohlwes, RJ
机构
[1] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non-English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non-English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% Cl, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (Cl, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (Cl, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (Cl, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (Cl, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (Cl, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (Cl, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (Cl, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 546
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] HIGH-RESOLUTION REAL-TIME ULTRASONOGRAPHY - A NEW TOOL IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
    ADAMS, DH
    FINE, C
    BROOKS, DC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 155 (01) : 93 - 97
  • [2] THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED-STATES
    ADDISS, DG
    SHAFFER, N
    FOWLER, BS
    TAUXE, RV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (05) : 910 - 925
  • [3] AMGWERD M, 1994, LANGENBECK ARCH CHIR, V379, P335
  • [4] [Anonymous], EMERG RADIOL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
  • [6] ACUTE APPENDICITIS - CT AND US CORRELATION IN 100 PATIENTS
    BALTHAZAR, EJ
    BIRNBAUM, BA
    YEE, J
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    ROSHKOW, J
    GRAY, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [7] BILBEY JH, 1989, J CAN ASSOC RADIOL, V40, P22
  • [8] Appendicitis at the millennium
    Birnbaum, BA
    Wilson, SR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 337 - 348
  • [9] Suspected appendicitis. Impact of enhanced helical CT. Prospective study in 100 patients.
    Bouillot, J
    Ruiz, A
    Alamowitch, B
    Capuano, G
    Aouad, K
    Fourmestraux, J
    Vadrot, D
    Bethoux, JP
    [J]. ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2001, 126 (05): : 427 - 433
  • [10] Cakirer Sinan, 2002, Emerg Radiol, V9, P155