Methods and Definition of Terms Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines

被引:28
作者
Marinopoulos, Spyridon S. [1 ]
Baumann, Michael H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
关键词
continuing medical education; evidence-based guideline; methods; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; STRENGTH; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1378/chest.08-2514
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: A core mission of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) is the education of its members, including continuing medical education (CME). The question of what evidence supports the effectiveness of CME activities became central to the ACCP's Educational Resources Division and its education committee. Methods: An application for consideration as a topic for an evidenced-based guideline was submitted to the ACCP Health and Science Policy Committee in 2004. The application was approved contingent on acceptance 1)), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) as a topic for an evidence-based review to be awarded to am AHRQ evidence-based practice center (EPC). The topic was accepted by AHRQ, with a collaborative revision developed 1)), AHRQ and ACCP of the focused questions submitted in the nomination. The AHRQ awarded the evidence review to The Johns Hopkins University EPC (Baltimore, MD). An expert writing panel was assembled comprising methodologists from the EPC, and recommendations were developed from the EPC evidence review and graded using the ACCP system of categorizing the strength of each recommendation and the quality of evidence. Conclusions: This section describes the processes used to develop these guidelines, including identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the evidence; assessing the strength of evidence; and grading each recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:17S / 28S
页数:12
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES QU, EFF CONT MED ED
[2]  
*AM COLL CHEST PHY, HSP EV BAS MED
[3]  
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[4]   ACCP evidence-based guideline development - A successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations [J].
Baumann, Michael H. ;
Lewis, Sandra Zelman ;
Gutterman, David .
CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) :1015-1024
[5]   Continuing Medical Education Effect on Physician Knowledge Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines [J].
Bordage, Georges ;
Carlin, Brian ;
Mazmanian, Paul E. .
CHEST, 2009, 135 (03) :29S-36S
[6]   Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews [J].
Buscemi, Nina ;
Harding, Lisa ;
Vandermeer, Ben ;
Tjosvold, Lisa ;
Klassen, Terry P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (07) :697-703
[7]   Continuing Medical Education Effect on Practice Performance Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines [J].
Davis, Dave ;
Galbraith, Robert .
CHEST, 2009, 135 (03) :42S-48S
[8]   Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines -: Report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force [J].
Guyatt, G ;
Gutterman, D ;
Baumann, MH ;
Addrizzo-Harris, D ;
Hylek, EM ;
Phillips, B ;
Raskob, G ;
Lewis, SZ ;
Schünemann, H .
CHEST, 2006, 129 (01) :174-181
[9]  
Hunt Elizabeth A, 2006, Biomed Instrum Technol, V40, P399, DOI 10.2345/i0899-8205-40-5-399.1
[10]   Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Moore, RA ;
Carroll, D ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Reynolds, DJM ;
Gavaghan, DJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01) :1-12